OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-msg message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: RE: non-ebXML links - T2



The meaning of the value "Transport" is not defined for
reliableMessagingMethod.  I don't think there is universal agreement with
your surmise.  The usual meaning of the word "Transport" and the meaning
intended almost everywhere in the MS spec. is the layer below ebXML-MS, and
the only bindings that we have provided are for HTTP and SMTP, neither of
which is reliable.  If the team means that "Transport" means "Other" here,
the spec should explain this point and, preferably, change the value to
"Other".

David Burdett take note.  This is a comment on V1.1.

Regards,
Marty

*************************************************************************************

Martin W. Sachs
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
P. O. B. 704
Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
914-784-7287;  IBM tie line 863-7287
Notes address:  Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Internet address:  mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
*************************************************************************************



"David Fischer" <david@drummondgroup.com> on 09/17/2001 12:55:30 AM

To:   Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, "Dan Weinreb" <dlw@exceloncorp.com>
cc:   <ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject:  RE: non-ebXML links



My understanding is that a value of reliableMessagingMethod="Transport"
essentially means Other.  There are other RM methods which can produce
onceandonlyonce and not be ebXML.  This is not the same as
deliverySemantics="BestEffort" which really means no RM.

David Fischer
Drummond Group.

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin W Sachs [mailto:mwsachs@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2001 8:43 PM
To: Dan Weinreb
Cc: dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com; david@drummondgroup.com;
david.burdett@commerceone.com; chris.ferris@east.sun.com;
arvola@tibco.com; ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: non-ebXML links



If the MS specification provides only one reliable-messaging algorithm,
then this is fully covered by the deliverySemantics attribute and there is
no need for the reliableMessagingMethod attribute.

Also, I can't find any description of the what the "Transport" value of
reliableMessagingMethod is for,  Since the word "Transport" appears in the
header of each page, it's a bit hard to search on this one, especially with
Acrobat's very primitive search function.  I assume that what is meant is
that reliability is provided, if at all, by the Transport layer.  We don't
have a binding for any transport that provides reliable messaging. I
suppose that there will be one some day for HTTPR if it becomes a standard.
In any case, reliableMessagingMethod="Transport" is exactly the same as
deliverySemantics="bestEffort".  Both mean that reliability is not provided
by ebXML; it MIGHT be provided by the transport.  So, I see no reason to
have both.

Regards,
Marty

********************************************************************************

*****

Martin W. Sachs
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
P. O. B. 704
Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
914-784-7287;  IBM tie line 863-7287
Notes address:  Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Internet address:  mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
********************************************************************************

*****



Dan Weinreb <dlw@exceloncorp.com> on 09/16/2001 09:11:50 PM

Please respond to Dan Weinreb <dlw@exceloncorp.com>

To:   Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
cc:   dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com, david@drummondgroup.com,
      david.burdett@commerceone.com, chris.ferris@east.sun.com,
      arvola@tibco.com, ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject:  Re: non-ebXML links



   Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 17:48:02 -0400
   From: Martin W Sachs <mwsachs@us.ibm.com>

               for the sake of everyone's sanity (including
   our own), we should eliminate all mention of non-ebXML protocols. They
   are implementer choices, not part of the ebXML-MS spec.

Just to make sure that I understand your position: Do we also feel
that we should eliminate the reliableMessagingMethod attribute,
section 8.7.4, and section 10.1.2?

----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>









[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC