RE: T2, Proposed solution for ... Re: SyncReplyandReliableMessagingMethod in QualityOfServiceInfo

[David Fischer <david@drummondgroup.com>]

Chris,

Yes, I agree.  Should we specify something here rather than leave it as
implementation dependant?  Making a note about minimum times between GC might
help with Interoperability.  Unfortunately, I can see this as a site parameter
rather than a CPA value -- could be a problem.  Any ideas what to do?

Regards,

David Fischer
Drummond Group.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Ferris@Sun.COM [mailto:Chris.Ferris@Sun.COM]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 9:59 AM
To: David Fischer
Cc: Dan Weinreb; arvola@tibco.com; ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: T2, Proposed solution for ... Re: SyncReply
andReliableMessagingMethod in QualityOfServiceInfo


David,

Let's not confuse GC with NRR archiving requirements.
From an RM perspective, the MSH must be able to perform GC
or it cannot be expected to perform with any degree of
efficiency.

Cheers,

Chris

David Fischer wrote:
>
> We have discussed this in the past and I have asserted that garbage collection
> would actually never happen at the To Party (unless it was some sort of IM
such
> as a Mailroom).  For legal reasons, garbage collection of business documents
> cannot occur until after 7 years (garbage collection is not in the spec is
it?).
> Instead of garbage collection, the To Party might occasionally Archive, which
> almost amounts to the same thing.  Even this would be infrequent.
>
> I suppose such a restriction would have something to do with either
> PersistDuration, TimeToLive or n*Retries*RetryInterval.  Or maybe this is
> something new which should go in the CPA?  I would lean toward PersistDuration
> but I am not sure we have a definitive understanding of what this should be.
> OTOH, this question might be out of scope.
>
> Ralph works for an EDI software company, how often is archiving typically
done?
> Is it done?
>
> Regards,
>
> David Fischer
> Drummond Group.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Weinreb [mailto:dlw@exceloncorp.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 10:25 PM
> To: david@drummondgroup.com
> Cc: arvola@tibco.com; ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: T2, Proposed solution for ... Re: SyncReply and
> ReliableMessagingMethod in QualityOfServiceInfo
>
>    Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 21:30:37 -0500
>    From: David Fischer <david@drummondgroup.com>
>
>                                                         The From Party can
perform
>    a Retry at any time it deems appropriate.
>
> Well, actually, I think there has to be some kind of restriction or
> else the To Party would never be able to garbage-collect its set of
> already-received message ID's, as we've discussed in the past.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>