[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [ebxml-msg] Re: [ebxml-cppa] Proposed schema changes,plusillustrative examp le
Could we use the GLN (Global Location Number) for this? For more information: http://www.uc-council.org/reflib/01801/ 1. What is meant by location? The GLN is a unique data structure that identifies any legal, functional or physical location within a business or organizational entity such as: Legal entities: whole companies, subsidiaries or divisions, e.g., supplier, customer, bank, forwarder, etc. Functional entities: a specific department within a legal entity, e.g., accounting department, returns department, customer number within a legal entity, etc. Physical entities: a particular room in a building, warehouse, warehouse gate, loading dock, delivery point, cabinet, cabinet shelf, housing circuit boards, room within a building, etc. -----Original Message----- From: Martin W Sachs [mailto:mwsachs@us.ibm.com] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 9:12 AM To: Dan Weinreb Cc: Jzheng@vitria.com; dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com; ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org; ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [ebxml-msg] Re: [ebxml-cppa] Proposed schema changes,plus illustrative examp le Dan, The CPA is defined as being between two Parties, each having a PartyId. If I remember correctly, the MS spec defines Parties as the sender and receiver of a message. What has to be made clear is that a business enterprise may consist of many Parties, so that PartyId cannot be equated with an enterprise. To make this clear, one may have to define the term "enterprise" or another term that works for both very large and very small companies. Regards, Marty ************************************************************************ ************* Martin W. Sachs IBM T. J. Watson Research Center P. O. B. 704 Yorktown Hts, NY 10598 914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287 Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com ************************************************************************ ************* Dan Weinreb <dlw@exceloncorp.com> on 10/28/2001 11:20:42 PM Please respond to Dan Weinreb <dlw@exceloncorp.com> To: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM@IBMUS cc: Jzheng@vitria.com, dmoberg@cyclonecommerce.com, ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org, ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [ebxml-cppa] Proposed schema changes, plus illustrative examp le Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 16:02:38 -0500 From: "Martin W Sachs" <mwsachs@us.ibm.com> OK, that's fine with me, as long as we make it very clear to our readership that a PartyId, *despite its name*, does not uniquely identify a "party". Is that right? MWS: Let's try this: An enterprise may own one or more PartyIds. A given PartyId belongs to only one enterprise. In that sense, it is unique. That's fine, as far as the relationship between "enterprise" and "PartyId" goes. But I also think we have to state that the relationship between "PartyId" and "party" is *not* that a PartyId identifies a party, as one might otherwise presume from the name. -- Dan ---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> ---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC