OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-msg message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: RE: [ebxml-msg] ebXML Message Service Specification


OK.  Done.

Arvola, was there anything else you wanted done to the Appendix A words?

David.

-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Ferris [mailto:chris.ferris@sun.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 8:15 AM
To: ebXML Msg
Subject: Re: [ebxml-msg] ebXML Message Service Specification


+1

Martin W Sachs wrote:

> I agree with Arvola. Once the schema is normative, and not just an example,
> we have to assume that there will be people who implement the schema and
> give only cursory attention to the text.
>
> Regards,
> Marty
>
>
********************************************************************************
*****
>
> Martin W. Sachs
> IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
> P. O. B. 704
> Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
> 914-784-7287;  IBM tie line 863-7287
> Notes address:  Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
> Internet address:  mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
>
********************************************************************************
*****
>
>
>
> David Fischer <david@drummondgroup.com> on 11/05/2001 09:58:35 PM
>
> To:    Arvola Chan <arvola@tibco.com>, Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
> cc:    ebXML Msg <ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Subject:    RE: [ebxml-msg] ebXML Message Service Specification
>
>
>
> Arvola,
>
> I guess you refer to:
>
>   I suggest that this sentence be struck out. The schema must be in sync
>   with
>   the specification because implementers will directly use the schema in
>   their
>   implementations.
>
> in reference to the sentence:
>
>   Note: if inconsistencies exist between the specification and this schema,
>   the specification supersedes this example schema.
>
> I disagree.  The spec must take precedence over the schema in the appendix.
> If
> there is a discrepancy, we must change the schema.  After we publish v1.1
> with
> the schema in the appendix, we can no longer make changes to the v1.1 spec
> but
> we can still make changes to the schema.
>
> I will make this change if the group decides you are right and I am wrong.
> Anyone?
>
> Regards,
>
> David.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arvola Chan [mailto:arvola@tibco.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 10:22 AM
> To: David Fischer; Martin W Sachs
> Cc: ebXML Msg
> Subject: Re: [ebxml-msg] ebXML Message Service Specification
>
>
> David:
>
> Please see
>
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ebxml-msg/200110/msg00183.html
>
> for my comments on the introductory material in Appendix A.
>
> Regards,
> -Arvola
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Fischer <david@drummondgroup.com>
> To: Martin W Sachs <mwsachs@us.ibm.com>; Arvola Chan <arvola@tibco.com>
> Cc: ebXML Msg <ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Date: Sunday, November 04, 2001 6:46 PM
> Subject: RE: [ebxml-msg] ebXML Message Service Specification
>
>
> This is really quite annoying!  Oh well.  I checked the entire document for
> references of 0 before I sent it out yet there they are?  Thanks for
> catching
> them.  I will make the rest of Arvola's corrections tomorrow.
>
> Arvola, please send me your Appendix A comments again.
>
> On the TraceHeader comments, weren't we going to vote on removing
> TraceHeaderList on Monday?
>
> Regards,
>
> David Fischer
> Drummond Group.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin W Sachs [mailto:mwsachs@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 9:47 AM
> To: Arvola Chan
> Cc: ebXML Msg
> Subject: Re: [ebxml-msg] ebXML Message Service Specification
>
>
>
> A few comments on Arvola's comments on 1.0.7 and a few other comments.
>
> Line 313, Reference to ebMSREQ:  I agree with Arvola.  You cannot reference
> a document which isn't published and available to anyone reading the
> specification.  You also can't simply ask OASIS to publish this one because
> it is undoubtedly far out of date.  I suggest capturing any needed points
> in ebMSREQ and putting them into the spec.
>
> Line 328:  I agree with Arvola.  A specification can't reference itself.
> Square brackets are reserved for pointing to the reference list.  Usually
> one says "this specification" rather than using a pseudo-reference acronym.
>
> Line 1355:  we have often used something like [ebCPPA] as an object when
> the object of the sentence is a specification.  I this case, the object is
> an XPointer, not the XPointer specification.
>
> Line 1447:  This section title is "Optional Features".  In RFC2119 terms
> (which this specification says it conforms to), OPTIONAL means that vendors
> do not have to implement the feature in question.  Does the MSG team intend
> that vendors be free to implement or not implement the functions in this
> section?  If not, find a word that is not on the RFC2119 list.  Please
> treat this is an issue, not as a comment to the technical editor.
>
> Line 1636:  Please check all mentions of the version attribute for
> references to section 0.  I found at least one that Arvola didn't call out.
>
> Reference list:  All references to ebXML specifications should include the
> current URLs. If the reference is post-v 1.0, it may have an OASIS URL
> instead of the original ebXML URL.
>
> Regards,
> Marty
>
> ****************************************************************************
>
> ****
> *****
>
> Martin W. Sachs
> IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
> P. O. B. 704
> Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
> 914-784-7287;  IBM tie line 863-7287
> Notes address:  Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
> Internet address:  mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
> ****************************************************************************
>
> ****
> *****
>
>
>
> Arvola Chan <arvola@tibco.com> on 11/01/2001 09:34:04 PM
>
> To:    ebXML Msg <ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org>
> cc:
> Subject:    Re: [ebxml-msg] ebXML Message Service Specification
>
>
>
> David:
>
> Please see my embedded editorial comments.
>
> Regards,
> -Arvola
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Fischer <david@drummondgroup.com>
> To: ebXML Msg <ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Date: Thursday, November 01, 2001 3:03 PM
> Subject: [ebxml-msg] ebXML Message Service Specification
>
>
> v1.07.  This has the ...-02.xsd schema included.
>
> I corrected a wording problem with syncReply.  The spec said if syncReply
> was
> true that the application had to wait for a business reply.  What if there
> is no
> business reply!  ;-)
>
> Regards,
>
> David Fischer
> Drummond Group.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>



----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC