[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [ebxml-msg]
Very Good Marty, I added your words to section 7.4.4. David. -----Original Message----- From: Martin W Sachs [mailto:mwsachs@us.ibm.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 10:32 PM To: Arvola Chan Cc: David Fischer; ebXML Msg; ebxml-cppa@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [ebxml-msg] Arvola, Your suggestion below should be accompanied by words in the definition of RetryInterval that state that RetryInterval applies to the time between sending of the original message and the first retry as well as the time between retries. This is missing from both the MSG spec and the CPPA spec. Regards, Marty ******************************************************************************** ***** Martin W. Sachs IBM T. J. Watson Research Center P. O. B. 704 Yorktown Hts, NY 10598 914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287 Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com ******************************************************************************** ***** Arvola Chan <arvola@tibco.com> on 11/06/2001 08:32:49 PM To: David Fischer <david@drummondgroup.com> cc: ebXML Msg <ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: Re: [ebxml-msg] David: How about rephrasing the sentence on lines 1738-1739 as: "For a reliably delivered message, TimeToLive MUST be greater than (Timestamp + Retries * RetryInterval)." I also agree with Dan that ExpirationTime would be a better name than TimeToLive. However, that will trigger other requisite descriptive changes because we currently have an errorCode named TimeToLiveExpired. Regards, -Arvola -----Original Message----- From: David Fischer <david@drummondgroup.com> To: Arvola Chan <arvola@tibco.com> Cc: ebXML Msg <ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org> Date: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 7:26 AM Subject: [ebxml-msg] Spec section 7.4.5: TimeToLive MUST be greater than the product of Retries and RetryInterval since the message was originally sent. Your comments: You cannot directly compare a dateTime quantity against a duration quantity. This does not directly compare. TimeToLive is compared to (Retries * RetryInterval) SINCE the message was originally sent. I believe this is correct. How would you prefer to say this? Regards, David Fischer Drummond Group. ---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> ---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> ---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC