[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [ebxml-msg] Proposed "idempotent" parameter and attribute and CPAelement
At the meeting today, we decided that the word "idempotent" should be avoided, since there is too much disagreement/confusion/controversy about what it means. Therefore, we're sticking with the phrase "duplicateElimination", and it's our understanding that the CPA will be changed to also use "duplicateElimination" in place of "idempotency". The main thing that needs to be fixed in the current discussion of duplicateElimination is the question of how the message header element interacts with what the CPA has to say on the matter. This is a special case of the general issue of reconciling the CPA and the message header. That general issue was debated and voted on yesterday (see minutes); it needs to be worked out with the CPA group, and then section on duplicateElimination will be brought into conformance with what is decided. -- Dan
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC