Re: [ebxml-msg] URI vs. URN

[Arvola Chan <arvola@tibco.com>]

David:

Please see http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt.

Section 1.2 URI, URL, and URN in the above document states:

A URI can be further classified as a locator, a name, or both.
Thus, a URN is also a URI. Therefore, I don't see any problem
with the URN we have chosen for the nextMSH and toPartyMSH.

Regards,
-Arvola

-----Original Message-----
From: David Fischer <david@drummondgroup.com>
To: ebXML Msg <ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:07 PM
Subject: [ebxml-msg] URI vs. URN


Are we going to run into any problems with the SOAP:actor being a URN?  I
checked the SOAP schema and it says the SOAP:actor attribute is anyURI.

Regards,

David Fischer
Drummond Group.


----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>