[ebxml-msg] Re: SyncReply Module

[Arvola Chan <arvola@tibco.com>]

David:

My understanding is that the SyncReply module is equivalent to the renaming
of the former Via module, minus the TraceHeaderList. As such, shouldn't it
stay in Part II (Additional Features) and under the Multi-hop chapter?

The syncReply attribute under QualityOfServiceInfo goes away because the use
of syncReply between the From and To parties is governed by a static (not
per pessage) parameter in the CPA.

In the single-hop case, it should be sufficient to indicate in the CPA that
sync reply is to be used, without explicitly including a SyncReply element
in the SOAP header.

Regards,
-Arvola

-----Original Message-----
From: David Fischer <david@drummondgroup.com>
To: ebXML Msg <ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Friday, November 16, 2001 3:59 PM
Subject: [ebxml-msg] v1.09


This includes all the edits I have received including those decided upon at
the
F2F this week.

I do not yet have a Conformance Clause or the new sub-section dealing with
Signature Security (Galvin).

Regards,

David Fischer
Drummond Group
ebXML-MS Editor.