[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [ebxml-msg] Comments on the 1.09 about MessageOrder
Yes, good point. David. -----Original Message----- From: Dan Weinreb [mailto:dlw@exceloncorp.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 8:17 AM To: david@drummondgroup.com Cc: ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [ebxml-msg] Comments on the 1.09 about MessageOrder Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 07:49:32 -0600 From: David Fischer <david@drummondgroup.com> There are other kinds of RM. We are explicitly excluding them in the case of MessageOrder? Sorry but I'm not catching on. What you do you mean by "other kinds of RM"? Are you talking about the scenario of reliable transports, where we assume that the transport protocol never drops messages and never duplicates messages, such as using MQSeries in place of HTTP? If so, I think we're probably on safe grounds assuming that if a transport protocol does these things, it also makes sure that messages arrive in order, so I don't see any problem there. -- Dan
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC