OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-msg message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Subject: Re: [ebxml-msg] Comments on the 1.09 about MessageOrder


In the near term, you are correct that the others are at the transport
level.  I don't know if they all take care about ordering.  Most likely,
they do. As long as the MSG team doesn't provide bindings for any of them,
they are irrelevant anyway.

I answered David's question as best as I could.  I am not really sure what
he was asking.



Martin W. Sachs
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
P. O. B. 704
Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
914-784-7287;  IBM tie line 863-7287
Notes address:  Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Internet address:  mwsachs @ us.ibm.com

Dan Weinreb <dlw@exceloncorp.com> on 12/05/2001 09:16:41 AM

Please respond to Dan Weinreb <dlw@exceloncorp.com>

To:    david@drummondgroup.com
cc:    ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject:    Re: [ebxml-msg] Comments on the 1.09 about MessageOrder

   Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 07:49:32 -0600
   From: David Fischer <david@drummondgroup.com>

   There are other kinds of RM.  We are explicitly excluding them in the
   case of

Sorry but I'm not catching on.  What you do you mean by "other kinds of

Are you talking about the scenario of reliable transports, where we
assume that the transport protocol never drops messages and never
duplicates messages, such as using MQSeries in place of HTTP?
If so, I think we're probably on safe grounds assuming that if
a transport protocol does these things, it also makes sure
that messages arrive in order, so I don't see any problem there.

-- Dan

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Powered by eList eXpress LLC