Re: [ebxml-msg] What Next?

[Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@sun.com>]

Big +1 to #1 & 2 below.

What about dealing with SOAP1.2? We could prepare to have
a version compatible with SOAP1.2 when it changes status
to PR or REC. That would involve some namespace changes
and a change to the HTTP Binding as well as treatment of
attachments.

Cheers,

Chris

ian.c.jones@bt.com wrote:

> Team,
> 
> 	I hope you have all had a pleasant break over the last couple of
> weeks.  As the title says what do we do next?  It is up to you, but here are
> some ideas to start with.
> 
> 1 - we MUST capture, answer and resolve any question and issues during the 3
> month public review of version 2.0
> 2 - The IIC TC would like to produce a conformance test/suite/documentation
> for version 2.0, they will obvious need help from us to do this.
> 3 - The Business interface layer has never been written - do we need it?
> 4 - A primer/introduction to the messaging service
> 5 - A document to describe the minimum implementation.  This may be linked
> to the IIC TC point above.
> 
> Question: - Do we still have outstanding requirements that still need to be
> addressed? i.e. a definable business need for them.
> 
> 	Over to all of you for comments.
> 
> Ian Jones
> Chair OASIS ebXML Messaging Services TC 
> 
> Email: ian.c.jones@bt.com 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>