[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [ebxml-msg] Re: issue 19
Thanks Marty, Are you referring to the attachment to the email found at [1] because you mention in [2] that it hasn't received any discussion within the CPP/A team to date? (I did notice one intermediate email containing a proposed large change.) Should we assume things will change substantially in the near future or wait for a more stable version? With either answer, we may be able to close issue 19 with editorial changes to our specification (even our Errata sheet for version 2.0) that reference the material the CPP/A team publishes. We should certainly review that material and provide comments to Marty and his team. Is that the way we'd like to move forward or do we have some requirement for this information to be part of our specification? thanx again, doug [1] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ebxml-cppa-negot/200210/msg00028.html [2] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ebxml-cppa-negot/200210/msg00031.html Martin W Sachs wrote: > The CPPA negotiation subteam has a draft CPA for the negotiation process. > It supports the negotiation BPSS instance that this subteam has developed. > > A draft of the negotiation specification has been posted to the > ebxml-cppa-negot list and can be reviewed in its archive. > > Regards, > Marty > > ************************************************************************************* > > Martin W. Sachs > IBM T. J. Watson Research Center > P. O. B. 704 > Yorktown Hts, NY 10598 > 914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287 > Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM > Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com > ************************************************************************************* ...
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC