Re: [ebxml-msg] Why are Revisions B and C still posted ?

[Pete Wenzel <pete@seebeyond.com>]

The lettered revisions were used only for internal committee specs prior 
to 2.0 becoming an OASIS standard, with "Rev C" being the last 
TC-approved version.  The 2.0 document dated 1 April 2002 and its 
corresponding schema is the same as Rev C, except that the "C" 
designation was removed and the date changed when it was presented to 
the OASIS membership.  You are probably right that the "B" and "C" 
versions should be removed from the public web site, and should not be 
referenced by others, to prevent confusion.

--Pete
Pete Wenzel <pete@seebeyond.com>
SeeBeyond
Standards & Product Strategy
+1-626-471-6311 (US-Pacific)

Mike Dillon - Drummond Group wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
>  I think several people have asked this question before and
>  I dont recall if we ever came up with an answer...
> 
>  I just noticed that PIDX (see
> 
>  http://committees.api.org/business/pidx/businessmessagessubcommittee.html )
>  is working a current project using Revision C.
>  Should we ask them to use the base, approved spec instead ?
> 
>  Thanks,
> mike dillon
> mike@drummondgroup.com