Re: [ebxml-msg] FW: [ebxml-msg-comment] Public Comment

[Pete Wenzel <pete@seebeyond.com>]

Good answers, Dale.  I also was confused by this:

> 2. Technical Architecture: In the area of implementation architecture, I
> think I have no problem on the end-end components.  
> 
> a. I have some questions on whether a dual-protocol (AS2 & ebMS)
> registry has been something anyone has done before? 
> 
> Dale> I am not certain what this means. The ebMS registry can be used to
> store ebXML information concerning business processes (BPSS instances)
> as well as profiles for messaging (CPPs and CPA templates). In the CPPA
> group, an editor's draft shows how a CPP could be used to support AS2,
> but it is not released. So an ebMS registry may eventually support
> profiles for AS2 if they emerge. If the question was, can a Registry be
> accessed using AS2, I think the answer at the moment is "no" [Including
> Farrukh on the list for confirmation on this.]

and assumed he was talking about participants who expose multiple
protocol endpoints, and how to register them all.  If AS2 had
something equivalent to CPP/CPA that could be registered, that would
solve the problem.  I wonder if the RosettaNet MMS program is tackling
this issue?

--Pete
Pete Wenzel <pete@seebeyond.com>
Senior Architect, SeeBeyond
Standards & Product Strategy
+1-626-471-6311 (US-Pacific)