[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Latest comments on pdf WD15
Latest comments on pdf WD15,
consolidated with previous list 10/23: Note here the additional (optional)
@pmode attribute, discussed Nov 15. -Jacques ---------------------------------- L278 (section 1.3) the 1st
sentence sounds weird: "..is the specification
of the MSH and its associated processing rules as a Web Service." do we
mean "and its associated processing rules using Web Service
standards"? L281: "...; propose to
remove the sentence with "EdNotes" starting "For example....coherent
framework" as what it conveys is mostly
repeated/detailed afterward, and developed L291 to L302. Instead: - L280 replace
"complete eBusiness" by "complete and coherent eBusiness" - add the following
sentence just before L285: "In order to achieve
this, message security and reliability requirements are met through the use of other Web Services
standards and their implementations. The message SOAP body has been...." L477: (in 2.2.2) extend: "...of an ebMS MEP (see
channel-binding)." as: "...of an ebMS MEP (see
channel-binding), but are not relevant to the ebMS MEP definition itself." L533: replace "SOAP
Request-response MEP" with "SOAP Request-response MEP and SOAP Response MEP" L535: replace: "is an
important aspect when defining ebMS MEPs." by " is yet to be
determined". L626: replace
"(@mpf)" with "(eb:PullRequest/@mpf attribute)” L793: replace "... is
able to prioritize the messages it received" with: "... is able to
prioritize the reception of its messages." L1219: replace "cases
(a), (c) or (d)" with "cases (1), (3) or (4)" L1223: replace (a) and (c)
with (1) and (3) L1233: replace "child
elements" with "children elements" to be conssitent with rest of doc. Same for L1322. L1375: (sec 5.2.3.7) Present attributes of
AgreementRef as a bullet list, and add @pmode: - @type - @pmode (optional):
"this optional attribute allows for explicitly associating a message with a P-Mode. When used,
its value contains the PMode.ID parameter." L1375: replace
"Inconsistent" with "ValueInconsistent" L1376: replace
"NotRecognized" with "ValueNotRecognized" L1397 (sec 5.2.3.10)
eb:Property: add a @type attribute. Allows to deal with conflicts between properties with same
name, also helps do some grouping, e.g. various elements of an address. L2473: concatenate L2474
right after. (remove the NL) L2485: replace "such as
an Acknowledgement" with "such as a missing Acknowledgement" L2489: replace :
"(false delivery success)" with "(false delivery)" L2512 (section 8.2.4) Add:
"It is RECOMMENDED that an implementation supports this acknowledgment
semantics." L2723: to dispatch
these "EdNotes" text items to the right place. Should the 1st and 3rd
bullet (SOAP Fault) be moved into
first bullet of 6.6? Second bullet seems to go in 10.2.1. in 6.7.1: ebMS error EBMS:0010: update
Description field of table as: The ebMS header or another
header (reliability, security) expected by the MSH, is not compatible with
expected content based on the associated P-Mode. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]