Ebms-3.0_conformanceprofiles-wd-07 issues

[Ric Emery <remery@us.axway.com>]

1)It looks to be an inconsistency in the Gateway RM V3 - Functional Aspect -
Message Packaging and Gateway RM V3 - Pmode[1].BusinessInfo.Properties[].

Gateway RM V3 - Functional Aspect - Message Packaging states that support
for MessageProperties is required. See page 6.
Gateway RM V3 - Pmode[1].BusinessInfo.Properties[] states that support is
not required. See Page 9.

Am I misunderstanding what the draft is trying to say?

2) Section 4 Conformance Profile - Gateway RM V2/3 looks to require support
for MessageOrder from Section 9 of the V2 spec. I do not think the profile
should require support for MessageOrder

General question. Do we want to tie the conformance profile draft to tests
in a UCC suite? It seems a bit odd to me. I think the draft should talk
about features from the ebMS 2 specification, not test cases from a test
profile that ebMS vendors may or may not be familiar with or conformant
with. The UCC test is one test profile, we could just as easily tie the
conformance profile to the set of Drummond tests. Personally I do not think
we should do either.

Thanks,
ric