[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: bundling rule clashes with WS-I BP
SOAP Body: the Body children elements of every ebMS message unit are listed at same level under the SOAP Body of the bundled message. These parts are still referred to by the eb3:PayloadInfo element of the related message unit header. An application that bundles multiple message units MUST make sure that any XML ID values that are unique in the message unit are also unique in the bundle.
BP 2.0 profile (similar one exists in BP 1.2 for SOAP 1.1):
R9981
(from issue: )
An ENVELOPE
MUST have exactly zero or one child elements of the soap12:Body
element.
in 4.4.1:
"
For document-literal bindings, the Profile requires that at most one
part, abstractly defined with the element
attribute, be serialized into the soap12:Body
element. ..."
Rationale is "...interoperability problems if
different implementations do not agree on the number of allowable children for
the soapXX:Body element. "
Proposal:
We should redefine this bundling rule so that all implementations must comply with WS-I BP, and puts all payloads except one, in attachments.
At best, the possibility of several Body children elements should be just an option (yet a "not recommended" one), that should not be required to be supported in the conformance clause - and can be controlled / agreed on via PMode.
Jacques
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]