[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ebxml-msg] Re: 15-day Review Request for ebms-header-3_0-200704_refactored
Hello,
My proposal is that we include the refactored schema as a
separate deliverable of Part 2. It is a schema with the same namespace as
the Core schema. A schema that uses it, imports it using a distinct
schemaLocation value. I think this is acceptable
as:
- an XML document is valid according to the refactored
schema iff it is valid according to the core schema and
- any element in a valid XML document has the same XML schema
type when parsed into an InfoSet using either of the two
schemas.
The upcoming v64 has the schema in a new appendix
B.
Pim From: Mary McRae [mailto:mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org] Sent: 24 June 2010 16:34 To: ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [ebxml-msg] Re: 15-day Review Request for ebms-header-3_0-200704_refactored I'm not sure what this is or what you're trying to do. ebXML
Messaging 3.0 is an OASIS Standard. If you want to make any changes whatsoever
they either need to fall under the errata process (which it sounds like this
isn't) or to create a 3.1 version of the spec and proceed through the normal
document cycle. It's impossible to change just the schema without changing the
document itself - even if it's just updating the cover page metadata and
including a new schema link.
Regards,
Mary
On Jun 23, 2010, at 2:32 PM, ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org
wrote: The following request was submitted on 23/06/2010: |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]