ebxml-msg message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: New drafts for AS4
- From: "Pim van der Eijk" <pvde@sonnenglanz.net>
- To: <ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:47:59 +0100
Hello,
Jacques and I worked
on cleaning up the AS4 draft for the 2nd PR over the past few
days.
Those of you with
AS4 implementations and/or WS-Security expertise, please have a look at the
examples (one new) in section A.
This draft does not
take into account some potential enhancements:
1) There has also
been some discussion about splitting the Client Conformance Clause in two
separate clauses,
- one
requiring full WS-Security support (X.509 and UserName token)
- and the
other only requiring the UserName token (relying on SSL/TLS to protect the
message)
Advantage:
even easier to implement and no PKI requirements
Downside: another conformance clause is
confusing.
2) A conformance
clause that requires support for AS2 and AS4, like the "Gateway V2/V3"
profiles require support for ebMS 2.0 and 3.0.
Advantage: may
increase acceptance of and confidence in AS4 in communities that are currently
AS2 users.
Downside: another conformance clause
is confusing.
If the TC decides in
favor of these changes, they can easily be added to the spec.
Pim
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]