I will be traveling on Wednesday evening so will unfortunately not be able to attend. Please note the following input from my side.
Aus AS4 SPR_00335171_Attach7 (Schedule 5)
3.2. This refers to Default Role in core spec which I do not see ?
Appendix 2 - Security.SendReceipt.ReplyPattern is set to "Callback" for the light profile ? This implies the light profile MSH having a separate http[s] listener active which is beyond the scope of the light client... Should this not be "Response".
General comments/questions
The November 2 public comment deadline is tight. I anticipate further issues on the schedules to arise during implementation
I see no reference on requirements for schema validation for payloads ? Does that imply that MSHs must not validate payloads ?
I see no availability of example (instance) messages or associated schemas in the schedules. Will these be made available ?
PS - bcc'd Michael
On 18 Oct 2012, at 9:10 AM, Pim van der Eijk wrote:
Hello,
As discussed yesterday, I asked if consolidated our feedback by next meeting meets the schedule, and can confirm it does.
Pim
-----------
Hi Pim.
Public consultation closes Friday 2nd November so timing should work well. In any event, we’d welcome the TC feedback regardless. Clearly we want the documents to reflect a correct application of the standard.
Regards
Michael
--
Regards
Theo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
ebxml-msg-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.orgFor additional commands, e-mail:
ebxml-msg-help@lists.oasis-open.org