[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Updated: (EBXMLMSG-21) @mpc attribute on UserMessage needs editorial fix and clarification
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/EBXMLMSG-21?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dale Moberg updated EBXMLMSG-21: -------------------------------- Proposal: Edit or replace the core language to say something like: "Unless the UserMessage is in response to a Pull request, the @mpc attribute need not be used. When the UserMessage is in response to a PullRequest and the @mpc attribute is absent, then the message reflects the use of the default MPC. But when the PullRequest signal used a specific value for the MPC, then the UserMessage MUST have an @mpc attribute, and the value of that attribute must equal the MPC URI value that was requested in the PullRequest signal. [Jacques Durand changes here.] was: Edit or replace the core language to say something like: "Unless the UserMessage is in response to a Pull request, the @mpc attribute is not used. When the UserMessage is in response to a PullRequest and the @mpc attribute is absent, then the message reflects the use of the default MPC. But when the PullRequest signal used a specific value for the MPC, then the UserMessage MUST have an @mpc attribute, and the value of that attribute must equal the MPC URI value that was requested in the PullRequest signal. > @mpc attribute on UserMessage needs editorial fix and clarification > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: EBXMLMSG-21 > URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/EBXMLMSG-21 > Project: OASIS ebXML Messaging Services TC > Issue Type: Bug > Components: AS4 Profile, Core Spec > Reporter: Dale Moberg > Priority: Minor > > ebMS 3 Core Spec section 5.2.2 has a section on the @mpc attribute of eb:Messaging/eb:UserMessage. > eb:Messaging/eb:UserMessage/@mpc: This OPTIONAL attribute contains a URI that > identifies the Message Partition Channel to which the message is assigned. The absence of this > element indicates the use of the default MPC. When the message is pulled, the value of this > attribute MUST indicate the MPC requested in the PullRequest message. > What is meant is conjectured to be that: > Unless the UserMessage is in response to a Pull request, the attribute is not used. When the UserMessage is in response > to a PullRequest and the @mpc attribute is absent, then the message reflects the use of the default MPC. But when the PullRequest > signal used a specific value for the MPC, then the UserMessage must have the @mpc attribute, and the value of that attribute must equal > the MPC URI value that was requested in the PullRequest signal. > The remark about "OPTIONAL" should be deleted as it is only a schema technicality, and is partly responsible for some confusion. > The confusion is interpreting that the @mpc attribute can be omitted when the PullRequest has used a specific value in its @mpc attribute. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]