OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-msg message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [ebxml-msg] EBMS0005 and EBMS0301


Makes sense to keep this implementation specific, or configurable in the best case…

 

Kr

 

Toon Vanhoutte

Integration Architect – Competence Manager – Microsoft Certified Trainer | Codit  

M +32 479 90 51 15  |  E toon.vanhoutte@codit.eu

W www.codit.eu  |  Blog blog.codit.eu  | Description: icon_Cloud_blue_mini www.integrationcloud.eu               

 

From: ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Makesh Rao (marao)
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 11:12 PM
To: Pim van der Eijk <pvde@sonnenglanz.net>; ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ebxml-msg] EBMS0005 and EBMS0301

 

Hi Pim

 

I’d agree with Sander here. For the Missing Receipt error, we should atleast have delivered or gotten a 200/201. I think our implementation gives a EBMS0005 today for connection failures.

 

~Makesh

 

From: "ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org" on behalf of Pim van der Eijk
Date: Monday, August 17, 2015 at 1:57 PM
To: "ebxml-msg@lists.oasis-open.org"
Subject: Fwd: Re: [ebxml-msg] EBMS0005 and EBMS0301

 

 



-------- Forwarded Message --------

Subject:

Re: [ebxml-msg] EBMS0005 and EBMS0301

Date:

Mon, 17 Aug 2015 22:50:58 +0200

From:

Sander Fieten <sander@fieten-it.com>

To:

Pim Van Der Eijk, van der <pvde@sonnenglanz.net>



Hi Pim,

 

actually I think it does not matter much which of those errors is reported as both indicate failure of message delivery. I would say this is implementation specific. For the MissingReceipt error I can imagine that someone expects that the message is at least sent once to the receiving MSH and that the sending MSH is waiting for a receipt. So it could be a recommendation that this error is only generated after a successful send operation on the http level. 

Reporting both errors is the most clearly indication of what happened. 

 

But as said I would leave it up to the implementations to decide which error(s) to generate and report.

 

Regards

Sander

 

----
Sander Fieten
IT Architect

FIETEN IT
e: 
sander@fieten-it.com

t:  +31 6 51507886

 

On 17 Aug 2015, at 19:45, Pim van der Eijk <pvde@sonnenglanz.net> wrote:

 


Hi,

In case an AS4 gateway, with a PMode configured to use AS4 reception
awareness and retries, attempts to send a message but, despite retries,
does not succeed in doing so because of persistent HTTP connection
failures,  it could generate errors, including the following:
-  an EBMS0005 (ConnectionFailure)
-  an EBMS0301 (MissingReceipt)

Which of the two do you think could, or should, be reported?  Only a
EBMS0005, only a EBMS0301,  both or  none?

Are there any other error cases that you think could apply?

Kind regards,

Pim




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

 

 

 



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]