[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [idtrust-ms] STORK 2 - EU cross-border identity pilot projects
Hal, do you know if there is any precedence to hiring standards experts on contractual basis via Oasis? I would presume we just have to request someone from the SAML TC who is in Europe to be the liaison. Regards, Anil On 05/13/2011 09:48 AM, Peter F Brown wrote: > OK, > > So the main question is: Who feels that they could provide authoritative > input and advice to the STORK 2 project, particularly with regard to SAML? > > If we can get a name, I’d be happy to provide the liaison with the proposed > STORK 2 consortium to get them on board. But we have to be quick, as the > deadline is looming…. > > > > And, yes, there is contractual money involved > > > > Regards, > > Peter > > > > From: Laurent M. Liscia [mailto:laurent.liscia@oasis-open.org] > Sent: Friday, 13 May, 2011 07:25 > To: peter@peterfbrown.com > Cc: 'Anil Saldhana'; hal.lockhart@oracle.com; Jamie.clark@oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: FW: STORK 2 > > > > Thank you Peter (what are you doing up so early?), > For once I can speak for OASIS since this is a bit of an admin issue. > OASIS does not possess IPR per se - our members do; that's why, even when we > are members of another org, we contribute no IPR. But we do have people > representing us in "consortia" or large-scale projects, such as STORK. I > think SIENA is exactly like STORK and we have Gershon Janssen and John > Borras speaking on behalf of OASIS: they provide advice and act as liaisons. > That is completely feasible. If Anil or Hal care to do the same ... > Finally it seems to me that the end-game is to get these guys to standardize > their output in OASIS as per the PEPPOL example. > > > On 5/12/2011 6:00 PM, Peter F Brown wrote: > > Hmmm, > > Is there anything we can do with this? > > Would SAML be interested and/or able to take this up? And how would we > handle the legal/contractual issues of ‘OASIS’ as an entity joining such a > consortium… > > > > From: Alicia Garcia Medina [mailto:alicia.garcia@atosresearch.eu] > Sent: Wednesday, 11 May, 2011 14:54 > To: Alicia Garcia Medina; peter@peterfbrown.com > Cc: Peter Kustor ; Alberto Crespo Garcia; Ana Maria Piñuela Marcos; > miguel.alvarez@mpr.es; Riedl Reinhard; Neil.Clowes@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk; > Reinhard Posch > Subject: RE: STORK 2 > > > > Dear Peter, > > > > I have communicated to the core team your interest and some question arises > since in STORK we do not create standards but support standardisation and we > would need technical advice on WP4´s SAML profile. > > > > Could you please indicate to me who would participate as legal entity? Is > OASIS a legal entity or will it be a company? > > > > I copy in this message WP4 leader (Miguel) and WP6 co-leaders (Reinhard and > Neil) so you all can check if this fits in STORK 2.0. > > > > Best regards, > > Alicia. > > > > > > From: Peter F Brown [mailto:peter@peterfbrown.com] > Sent: martes, 10 de mayo de 2011 19:57 > To: 'Reinhard Posch' > Cc: 'Peter Kustor '; Alicia Garcia Medina > Subject: RE: STORK 2 > > > > Hi Reinhard, thanks for the prompt reply. > > > > Indeed, the project is about pilots and with an extended scope as you say, > with health sector and banking. > > Our concern, as OASIS, would be to see what role we can play in facilitating > the development of new – or greater take-up of existing – standards in this > project. As you know, we have a new TC set up to pursue work for PEPPOL (the > OASIS BDX TC) that will hopefully provide a durable standard beyond the > lifetime of that large-scale pilot – so the main question is: has STORK > identified a “gap in the market” of IDM standards that needs to be filled? > If the answer is yes, then our participation could be helpful; if no, then > it would be a different issue. > > > > All the best, > > Peter > > > > > > From: Reinhard Posch [mailto:reinhard.posch@cio.gv.at] > Sent: Monday, 09 May, 2011 21:34 > To: peter@peterfbrown.com > Cc: Peter Kustor > Subject: Re: STORK 2 > > > > .. indeed June 1st is very near. On the question of technicality of joining > this late > > Alicia Garcia Medina<alicia.garcia@atosresearch.eu> from ATOS could give > > you more details. > > Then it would come to what is OASIS bringing to the pilots. It is pilots - > having > > said this I mean that it is about interoperability of existing eID of Member > States > > also with flavors like using them in the private sector like banks and heath > care. > > > > Was nice to hear from you > > Reinhard > > > > > > Am 10.05.2011 um 01:40 schrieb Peter F Brown: > > > > Hi, > > I was talking last week in Brussels with Jean-Francois Junger at the > European Commission and he mentioned the current CfP for the next phase of > STORK. > > > > He suggested that OASIS, as a standards organisation active in IDM, ought to > consider joining the proposed new consortium, and help with the delivery of > standards to be used in the STORK. > > > > Any thoughts on the matter? Is it realistic, given that the deadline is 1st > June? > > > > Best regards from (not so sunny) Los Angeles > > > > Peter > > > > Peter F Brown > > Independent Consultant > > <image001.png> > > Transforming our Relationships with Information Technologies > > <x-msg://101/www.peterfbrown.com> www.peterfbrown.com > > P.O. Box 49719, Los Angeles, CA 90049, USA > > Tel: +1.310.694.227
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]