OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

egov-ms message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [idtrust-ms] STORK 2 - EU cross-border identity pilot projects


Hal,
do you know if there is any precedence to hiring standards experts on 
contractual basis via Oasis?

I would presume we just have to request someone from the SAML TC who is 
in Europe to be the liaison.

Regards,
Anil

On 05/13/2011 09:48 AM, Peter F Brown wrote:
> OK,
>
> So the main question is: Who feels that they could provide authoritative
> input and advice to the STORK 2 project, particularly with regard to SAML?
>
> If we can get a name, I’d be happy to provide the liaison with the proposed
> STORK 2 consortium to get them on board. But we have to be quick, as the
> deadline is looming….
>
>
>
> And, yes, there is contractual money involved
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> From: Laurent M. Liscia [mailto:laurent.liscia@oasis-open.org]
> Sent: Friday, 13 May, 2011 07:25
> To: peter@peterfbrown.com
> Cc: 'Anil Saldhana'; hal.lockhart@oracle.com; Jamie.clark@oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: FW: STORK 2
>
>
>
> Thank you Peter (what are you doing up so early?),
> For once I can speak for OASIS since this is a bit of an admin issue.
> OASIS does not possess IPR per se - our members do; that's why, even when we
> are members of another org, we contribute no IPR. But we do have people
> representing us in "consortia" or large-scale projects, such as STORK. I
> think SIENA is exactly like STORK and we have Gershon Janssen and John
> Borras speaking on behalf of OASIS: they provide advice and act as liaisons.
> That is completely feasible. If Anil or Hal care to do the same ...
> Finally it seems to me that the end-game is to get these guys to standardize
> their output in OASIS as per the PEPPOL example.
>
>
> On 5/12/2011 6:00 PM, Peter F Brown wrote:
>
> Hmmm,
>
> Is there anything we can do with this?
>
> Would SAML be interested and/or able to take this up? And how would we
> handle the legal/contractual issues of ‘OASIS’ as an entity joining such a
> consortium…
>
>
>
> From: Alicia Garcia Medina [mailto:alicia.garcia@atosresearch.eu]
> Sent: Wednesday, 11 May, 2011 14:54
> To: Alicia Garcia Medina; peter@peterfbrown.com
> Cc: Peter Kustor ; Alberto Crespo Garcia; Ana Maria Piñuela Marcos;
> miguel.alvarez@mpr.es; Riedl Reinhard; Neil.Clowes@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk;
> Reinhard Posch
> Subject: RE: STORK 2
>
>
>
> Dear Peter,
>
>
>
> I have communicated to the core team your interest and some question arises
> since in STORK we do not create standards but support standardisation and we
> would need technical advice on WP4´s SAML profile.
>
>
>
> Could you please indicate to me who would participate as legal entity? Is
> OASIS a legal entity or will it be a company?
>
>
>
> I copy in this message WP4 leader (Miguel) and WP6 co-leaders (Reinhard and
> Neil) so you all can check if this fits in STORK 2.0.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Alicia.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Peter F Brown [mailto:peter@peterfbrown.com]
> Sent: martes, 10 de mayo de 2011 19:57
> To: 'Reinhard Posch'
> Cc: 'Peter Kustor '; Alicia Garcia Medina
> Subject: RE: STORK 2
>
>
>
> Hi Reinhard, thanks for the prompt reply.
>
>
>
> Indeed, the project is about pilots and with an extended scope as you say,
> with health sector and banking.
>
> Our concern, as OASIS, would be to see what role we can play in facilitating
> the development of new – or greater take-up of existing – standards in this
> project. As you know, we have a new TC set up to pursue work for PEPPOL (the
> OASIS BDX TC) that will hopefully provide a durable standard beyond the
> lifetime of that large-scale pilot – so the main question is: has STORK
> identified a “gap in the market” of IDM standards that needs to be filled?
> If the answer is yes, then our participation could be helpful; if no, then
> it would be a different issue.
>
>
>
> All the best,
>
> Peter
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Reinhard Posch [mailto:reinhard.posch@cio.gv.at]
> Sent: Monday, 09 May, 2011 21:34
> To: peter@peterfbrown.com
> Cc: Peter Kustor
> Subject: Re: STORK 2
>
>
>
> .. indeed June 1st is very near. On the question of technicality of joining
> this late
>
> Alicia Garcia Medina<alicia.garcia@atosresearch.eu>  from ATOS could give
>
> you more details.
>
> Then it would come to what is OASIS bringing to the pilots. It is pilots -
> having
>
> said this I mean that it is about interoperability of existing eID of Member
> States
>
> also with flavors like using them in the private sector like banks and heath
> care.
>
>
>
> Was nice to hear from you
>
> Reinhard
>
>
>
>
>
> Am 10.05.2011 um 01:40 schrieb Peter F Brown:
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I was talking last week in Brussels with Jean-Francois Junger at the
> European Commission and he mentioned the current CfP for the next phase of
> STORK.
>
>
>
> He suggested that OASIS, as a standards organisation active in IDM, ought to
> consider joining the proposed new consortium, and help with the delivery of
> standards to be used in the STORK.
>
>
>
> Any thoughts on the matter? Is it realistic, given that the deadline is 1st
> June?
>
>
>
> Best regards from (not so sunny) Los Angeles
>
>
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> Peter F Brown
>
> Independent Consultant
>
> <image001.png>
>
> Transforming our Relationships with Information Technologies
>
>   <x-msg://101/www.peterfbrown.com>  www.peterfbrown.com
>
> P.O. Box 49719, Los Angeles, CA 90049, USA
>
> Tel: +1.310.694.227


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]