[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [egov-ws] Preparations for the ebXML/Web Services SubcommitteeMeeting on March 12
Jouko, That was my interpretation, but I acknowledge your concern (you are not alone with this problem) and defer to John Borras for the final word on this. Perhaps this is something that we can resolve/clarify at the TC meeting on March 12. Please let me know your thoughts on this issue John. In the meantime, I have attached an RTF version of the document (the formatting didn't translate very well, but the content is obviously the same) which you should be able to open with MS-Word and Wordperfect among others. I hope this helps, David (See attached file: Draft ebXML-web services SC Charter, Ver 1.rtf) "Jouko Salonen" To: david.layton@gsa.gov, <jouko.salonen@rep egov-ws@lists.oasis-open.org, echristi@USGS.GOV, ublica.fi> marion.royal@gsa.gov cc: John.Borras@e-Envoy.gsi.gov.uk 02/27/2003 01:46 Subject: RE: [egov-ws] Preparations for the AM ebXML/Web Services Subcommittee Meeting on March 12 David I'm sorry, but this open office format may make it inpossible for some of us to open the document. I personally would be happy to join the "open office family", but some organisations may have IT-policy level rules that prevent people to install this. I think we discussed this during the first meeting in Baltimore and Jon Bosak was proposing open office, but did we actually decide to use that? Best regards Jouko Salonen -----Original Message----- From: david.layton@gsa.gov [mailto:david.layton@gsa.gov] Sent: 26. helmikuuta 2003 22:29 To: egov-ws@lists.oasis-open.org; echristi@USGS.GOV; marion.royal@gsa.gov Cc: John.Borras@e-Envoy.gsi.gov.uk Subject: [egov-ws] Preparations for the ebXML/Web Services Subcommittee Meeting on March 12 Hello all, Thanks for your interest in the ebXML / web services subcommittee (SC) and willingness to contribute ideas, expertise and time to this important initiative. As a starting point to help focus our energies and identify priorities, I have attached a draft charter for this SC for your review and comment. This document is very much subject to change based on your feedback. With your help, it should evolve into a document that will not only guide and bound our efforts, but also one that reflects the team's consensus view of what we should be doing. Please review the charter and provide specific recommendations for how it can be enhanced or better aligned with your understanding of what the SC should be seeking to accomplish. Note that the document is in OpenOffice format (available for download from www.openoffice.org if needed) per guidance received at the Dec 13 TC kick-off meeting. Please provide feedback to me via email no later than March 7. If you would like to discuss your feedback in person, feel free to call me at the phone number listed below. After collecting all comments, I will reconcile (wherever possible) and incorporate feedback into another iteration of the charter for discussion at the March 12 SC meeting. This process should identify areas of agreement as well as disagreements and differing viewpoints. One of the objectives of the March 12 SC meeting will be to resolve any such differences and finalize the charter. To facilitate the process of collecting and incorporating feedback, please adhere to the following ground rules in your review: Provide a single response/document capturing all of your comments. The preferred method would be to simply mark-up the document itself (using the "record changes" feature of OpenOffice) with any modifications you feel are necessary, but I can work with whatever method is easiest for you. Be specific and succinct in your recommendations, and include the exact wording that you would like to see incorporated in the charter to address any concerns you may have. Provide the rationale for recommended changes if it is not self-evident. Unless you have significant issues with the high-level topics that are covered in the document (i.e., scope and purpose, deliverables, timeline and priorities) and how it is structured, please focus on the content of the document rather than how it is organized. That said, I will entertain structural changes if there is a compelling reason to do so. Other topics: Jon Bosak has graciously offered to serve as vice-chairman of this SC, but we will also need volunteers to fill other roles (e.g., secretary) as well. Over the next few days I will publish (via the SC listserv) what I think are the necessary roles and ask for both comments and volunteers. I will also provide a first-cut of the agenda and objectives for the SC's portion of the March 12 meeting in the next few days. Thanks in advance for your contributions and support. Looking forward to seeing (or hearing from) you at the March 12 meeting and working together on this important challenge. Regards, David Layton U.S. General Services Administration Office of E-Government & Technology E-Government Strategy Division Phone: 202-219-0815 (See attached file: Draft ebXML-web services SC Charter, Ver 1.sxw)
Attachment:
Draft ebXML-web services SC Charter, Ver 1.rtf
Description: RTF file
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC