[Fwd: [P1619-3] FW: Layout of Your June Security Column]

[Arshad Noor <arshad.noor@strongauth.com>]

FYI.

 From my perspective, there is no conflict with SKSML and the
IEEE protocol.  The 1619.3 WG is committed to solving the KM
problem for storage devices, while SKSML/EKMI addresses KM
for everything in an enterprise.  Once both standards have
been finalized, it is my personal belief that Storage Device
Management Consoles will accept KM policies/keys from either
1619.3 KM Servers or from EKMI's SKS Servers and use the IEEE
protocol to push it down to the storage devices.

If you haven't already thought of attending the KMS 2008 in
Baltimore in the fall, you might want to consider attending.
It will be the first time that EKMI, KEYPROV (the IETF group)
and the IEEE 1619.3 WG will be discussing their work in one
place under one conference.  Should be exciting.

http://keymanagementsummit.com/2008/index.php?option=com_frontpage&Itemid=1

Arshad Noor
StrongAuth, Inc.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [P1619-3] FW: Layout of Your June Security Column
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 10:54:02 -0700
From: Luther Martin <martin@VOLTAGE.COM>
Reply-To: Luther Martin <martin@VOLTAGE.COM>
To: P1619-3@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG

FYI - here's the final version of the IEEE Computer column on P1619.1 
that will be out in June.

r6secu.pdf