[Fwd: Re: [election-services-comment] Eml meeting:internationalization support in eml.]

[Oliver Hernàndez Valls <oliver.hernandez@scytl.com>]

-------- Missatge reenviat --------
De: Oliver Hernà ndez Valls <oliver.hernandez@scytl.com>
Per a: John Borras <johnaborras@yahoo.co.uk>
Cc: David Mas <david.mas@scytl.com>, EML TC <election-
services@lists.oasis-open.org>
Assumpte: Re: [election-services-comment] Eml meeting:
internationalization support in eml.
Data: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:18:14 +0200

Hello everyone,
	I was only trying to clarify our situation. I had no intention to hurry
or make pressure on you, instead we appreciate a lot all the work that
has been done in this standard.
	We'll wait your comments until after the meeting.
	

Regards


El dj 14 de 06 del 2007 a les 09:20 +0100, en/na John Borras va
escriure:
> Oliver
>  
> As I mentioned to your colleague David earlier, we will discuss your
> questions next week at our committee meeting and I will let you know
> our views after that.
>  
> Regards
> John Borras
> TC Chair
> 
> Oliver Hernà ndez Valls <oliver.hernandez@scytl.com> wrote:
>         Hi all,
>         By the comments of mister David Webber we understand that he
>         is using a
>         message-per-language approach. Instead we would like to use a
>         single
>         message-per-process at least for 110, 330 and 630. In some
>         other cases
>         we will use a file localized in a single language for example
>         in 410-
>         Ballots or 420-Authentication (message-per-language approach).
>         
>         After reading the Process-Data-Requirements, it seems there is
>         no
>         standard approach for localizing messages. Or is it message-
>         per-language
>         (this could explain this discussion)? If it is message-per-
>         language why
>         then Messages/Message elements with a 'lang' attribute?
>         
>         Because the optionality of MessageLanguage in EMLstructure we
>         can't
>         assume a message-per-attribute approach.
>         
>         In our modest opinion internationalization can be issued in 2
>         ways,
>         using a message-per-language approach or making all elements
>         susceptible
>         to be shown to the user internationalizable.
>         Is there an official EML approach for all messages? Does this
>         approach
>         varies in each message (110, 230, 330...)?
>         
>         It will be a good thing to know the approach to be used in
>         each case
>         because as EML is a standard there must be a standard way to
>         internationalize messages.
>         
>         
>         Best regards
>         
>         -- 
>         ______________________________
>         Oliver Hernà ndez Valls
>         Software Engineer
>         
>         Scytl Secure Electronic Voting
>         
>         Tuset 20 · 08006 Barcelona 
>         Phone + 34 934 230 324
>         Fax + 34 933 251 028
>         www.scytl.com
>         
>         NOTICE: The information in this e-mail and in any of its
>         attachments is
>         confidential and intended solely for the attention and use of
>         the named
>         addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any
>         disclosure,
>         copying, distribution or retaining of this message or any part
>         of it,
>         without the prior written consent of Scytl Secure Electronic
>         Voting, SA
>         is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
>         in error,
>         please contact the sender and delete the material from any
>         computer. 
>         
>         
>         This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to
>         the
>         OASIS Election and Voter Services TC.
>         
>         In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms
>         and
>         to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
>         before posting.
>         
>         Subscribe: election-services-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-
>         open.org
>         Unsubscribe: election-services-comment-
>         unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
>         List help: election-services-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
>         List archive: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/election-
>         services-comment/
>         Feedback License: http://www.oasis-
>         open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
>         List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-
>         open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>         Committee: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?
>         wg_abbrev=election
>         
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Inbox full of unwanted email? Get leading protection and 1GB storage
> with All New Yahoo! Mail.
-- 
______________________________
Oliver Hernà ndez Valls
Software Engineer

Scytl Secure Electronic Voting

Tuset 20 · 08006 Barcelona 
Phone   + 34 934 230 324
Fax     + 34 933 251 028
www.scytl.com

NOTICE: The information in this e-mail and in any of its attachments is
confidential and intended solely for the attention and use of the named
addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or retaining of this message or any part of it,
without the prior written consent of Scytl Secure Electronic Voting, SA
is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this in error,
please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.