RE: Voter Identity

[Michael Zolotarev <michael.zolotarev@baltimore.com>]

> 
> I think that for all these reasons, we absolutely must have 
> the ability to
> identify individual voters.  This doesn't mean that total 
> anonymity isn't
> an option ? it just can't be the only option.

Obviously that statement is true, when applied to an election compain "in
general". At the same time, been able to identify an individual voter does
not necessarily mean that the voter's identity is referenced by a vote or a
ballot token. It may, or it may not. And even if it is referenced by a
token, the type of the "identity" may not necessarily be the person's real -
i.e. name/surname - identity.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended 
for the addressee(s) only.  If you have received this message in error or 
there are any problems please notify the originator immediately.  The 
unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is 
strictly forbidden. Baltimore Technologies plc will not be liable for direct, 
special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the 
contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being 
passed on.

In addition, certain Marketing collateral may be added from time to time to 
promote Baltimore Technologies products, services, Global e-Security or 
appearance at trade shows and conferences.
 
This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by 
Baltimore MIMEsweeper for Content Security threats, including
computer viruses.