[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [election-services] GAO VVSG response item #1
Happy with the tweaks. The ball is back with you, let me know when you want further input. John -----Original Message----- From: David Webber (XML) [mailto:david@drrw.info] Sent: 11 July 2005 21:11 To: Borras, John; Paul Spencer Cc: election-services@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [election-services] GAO VVSG response item #1 John, Still needs few more tweaks here - to make sure associated parts remain together - little disjointed as it was - amended copy below. Also - I'm intending that we can send this to GAO as part of their request for comment on their VVSG1 - but there is more to be done on that front, so this piece should become part of that overall submission. I'll work up some thoughts on a possible outline structure for a response that introduces EML to the GAO, and then suggests where their VVSG1 has opportunities to leverage EML. We can then see who would like to spend their summer holidays typing some of that for us! DW <vote_process_terms> Digital vote records, audit trail control and vote process configuration and control scripts should be implemented, stored and prepared using open public specifications which are royalty free and provide open public license terms. The configuration, rendering and transfer of such records and voting content should use formats that utilize content mark-up language techniques such as the widely adopted Extensible Mark-up Language (XML) syntax along with content formats such as those specified by the OASIS Election Mark-up Language (EML) standard. The process definitions and implementations can then be independently verified and compatibility certified. </vote_process_terms> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Borras, John" <John.Borras@legsb.gov.uk> To: "David Webber (XML)" <david@drrw.info>; "Paul Spencer" <paul.spencer@boynings.co.uk> Cc: <election-services@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 10:13 AM Subject: RE: [election-services] GAO VVSG response item #1 I'm not an English major but..... Here's my take which avoids repetition about open public specs and brings the royalty free but up front - v important. Any final comments? <vote_process_terms> Digital vote records, audit trail control and vote process configuration and control scripts should be implemented, stored and prepared using open public specifications, which are royalty free and provide open public license terms, and process definitions that can be independently verified and with which compatibility can be certified. The configuration, rendering and transfer of such records and voting content should use formats that utilize content mark-up language techniques such as the widely adopted Extensible Mark-up Language (XML) syntax along with formats specified by the OASIS Election Mark-up Language (EML) standard. </vote_process_terms> David - who do I send this to as TC Chair? John "The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you receive this email by mistake please notify the sender and delete it immediately. Opinions expressed are those of the individual and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the Local e-Government Standards Body. All sent and received email from the Local e-Government Standards Body is automatically scanned for the presence of computer viruses and security issues."
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]