Re: [election-services] OASIS Demo for NASS / NASED

[John Borras <johnaborras@yahoo.co.uk>]

Peter

 

Thanks for these thoughts, a very good starter for our discussions.  However before we get to this level of detail I think it would be very useful to agree the objectives of the proposed Demo to focus our minds on what we are trying to achieve before we descend into the weeds.  Below are my thoughts, not in any particular order of importance, and I'd welcome agreement or otherwise on these please.

 

- to show how EML can be used in a multi-channel e-voting ballot involving several suppliers

- to localise the Demo in such a way as to ensure the ballots are understandable to the American participants and conform to their usual voting practices

- to show how EML can meet the requirements of the draft EAC Voluntary Voting System Guidelines

- to show how the EML TC and the IEEE 1622 committee are collaborating to deliver consistent outputs and interoperable solutions

- to demonstrate how EML can support multi-lingualism eg English, Spanish, (others?)

- to help the audience better understand the scope, breadth, flexibility and advantages of using EML

- to identify any weaknesses in v5 that need to be addressed in future releases.

 

 

John

"Zelechoski, Peter" <pzelechoski@essvote.com> wrote:

At the OASIS Demo this week, John asked us to think about doing a demo in the US -- most likely at the NASS / NASED Conference that is scheduled to take place in Washington DC this coming February.

I am attaching a draft outline for discussion amongst our TC.

- Peter
<<NassNasedKeyDemoPoints.ppt>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

---

Yahoo! Answers - Get better answers from someone who knows. Try
it now.