OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

election-services message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [election-services] OASIS Demo for NASS / NASED


I really like your list of goals here.

We definately have examples of high profile ballot samples from real previous elections that fit for what you are needing - that we can use.

I guess doing a "re-election" could be fun for attendees!?! 

Weaknesses in V5?!? ; -)

I already have some good thoughts on the 510 from the CA example from feedback there.

Bottom line in the "better V5" department - is the need in V6 to re-factor the data model - as the pre-requisite.  Rome was not built in a day of course...!


"The way to be is to do" - Confucius (551-472 B.C.)

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [election-services] OASIS Demo for NASS / NASED
> From: John Borras <johnaborras@yahoo.co.uk>
> Date: Thu, November 01, 2007 10:59 am
> To: eml <election-services@lists.oasis-open.org>,  Lori Steele
> <lori@everyonecounts.com>,  Craig Burton <craig@everyonecounts.com>
> Peter
>   Thanks for these thoughts, a very good starter for our discussions.  However before we get to this level of detail I think it would be very useful to agree the objectives of the proposed Demo to focus our minds on what we are trying to achieve before we descend into the weeds.  Below are my thoughts, not in any particular order of importance, and I'd welcome agreement or otherwise on these please.
>   - to show how EML can be used in a multi-channel e-voting ballot involving several suppliers
>   - to localise the Demo in such a way as to ensure the ballots are understandable to the American participants and conform to their usual voting practices
>   - to show how EML can meet the requirements of the draft EAC Voluntary Voting System Guidelines 
>   - to show how the EML TC and the IEEE 1622 committee are collaborating to deliver consistent outputs and interoperable solutions
>   - to demonstrate how EML can support multi-lingualism eg English, Spanish, (others?)
>   - to help the audience better understand the scope, breadth, flexibility and advantages of using EML
>   - to identify any weaknesses in v5 that need to be addressed in future releases.
>   John
> "Zelechoski, Peter" <pzelechoski@essvote.com> wrote:
>       At the OASIS Demo this week, John asked us to think about doing a demo in the US -- most likely at the NASS / NASED Conference that is scheduled to take place in Washington DC this coming February.
>   I am attaching a draft outline for discussion amongst our TC. 
>   - Peter 
> <<NassNasedKeyDemoPoints.ppt>> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
> ---------------------------------
>  Yahoo! Answers - Get better answers from someone who knows. Tryit now.

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]