Re: [election-services] Re possible EML v5.0 submission to ISO/IEC JTC1

[John Borras <johnaborras@yahoo.co.uk>]

Jamie/David

 

I can confirm that the TC voted to approve the ISO route way back at our meeting in Nov 06.  So it's been a long time coming but has been our unwavering intent since then.

 

John

 

James Bryce Clark <jamie.clark@oasis-open.org> wrote:

Thanks for the kind assumption, David, but Lord no: if "EML" is
the way that your implementers to date, Council of Europe, etc. know
it, then that's your "brand" and we ought to go with it.
And as for vote, no need, I have been informed that the TC
already was consulted and indicated its desire to submit.
Just waiting now for the advice about which JTC1 panel ought to
receive it. Which I hope to see by calendar month end, knowing a
bit about the schedules of those involved.
Regards Jamie

-------- Original Message --------
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 07:33:52 -0700
From: David RR Webber (XML)
Subject: RE: Fw: [election-services] Re possible EML v5.0
submission to
ISO/IEC JTC1
To: John Borras
cc: David Canning , Stuart
Harrington
, EML TC
, James Bryce Clark


John,
Looks very good to me.
I think Jamie was thinking the ElectionML was more meaningful for ISO
members - but I agree - there's enough in the material to make it clear
what EML relates to - and best not to add a potential cause for
confusion.
I agree this positioning is spot on.
Let's hope ISO likes it too!
Do we need a formal approve for the submission format - or just a show
of hands here?
Thanks, DW

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

Regards
John

M. +44 (0)7976 157745
Skype:  gov3john

---

Rise to the challenge for Sport Relief with Yahoo! for Good