John
I agree.
Best
wishes
Roy Hill
Director Research and Innovation
OPT2VOTE
Ltd
Tel:
02871 371111
Email: rhill@opt2vote.com
All opinions expressed are my own.
All emails have been scanned with Norton
Antivirus
-----------------------------------------------------
From: John Borras
[mailto:johnaborras@yahoo.co.uk]
Sent: 25 July 2008 16:08
To: Roy Hill;
Subject: Re: [election-services]
Fw: VIP/EML CONVERGENCE?
I think your concerns support my proposed approach of keeping this
within a
Regards
John
M. +44 (0)7976 157745
Skype: gov3john
----- Original Message
----
From: Roy Hill <rhill@opt2vote.com>
To: John Borras <johnaborras@yahoo.co.uk>;
Sent: Friday, 25 July, 2008 3:55:05 PM
Subject: RE: [election-services] Fw: VIP/EML CONVERGENCE?
John
I’m not sure that we have got to the
bottom of the VIP requirements yet and unfortunately I know so little about
them that I can’t add anything specific. My concerns are that we might
solve one thing, and then because we haven’t all of the necessary information
find that there are others that will also need attention resulting in a
piecemeal approach.
I am like you, and believe that this is
probably just peculiar to
Best
wishes
Roy Hill
Director Research and Innovation
OPT2VOTE
Ltd
Tel:
02871 371111
Email: rhill@opt2vote.com
All opinions expressed are my own.
All emails have been scanned with Norton
Antivirus
-----------------------------------------------------
From: John Borras
[mailto:johnaborras@yahoo.co.uk]
Sent: 25 July 2008 15:47
To: Roy Hill;
Subject: Re: [election-services]
Fw: VIP/EML CONVERGENCE?
What sort
of "specific integration requirements" have you in mind or
is it just a general worry that we haven't got to the bottom of the VIP
requirements yet?
Have you
come across this sort of requirement anywhere else or like me do you think this
is peculiar to
Regards
John
M. +44 (0)7976 157745
Skype: gov3john
----- Original Message
----
From: Roy Hill <rhill@opt2vote.com>
To: John Borras <johnaborras@yahoo.co.uk>;
Sent: Friday, 25 July, 2008 3:37:26 PM
Subject: RE: [election-services] Fw: VIP/EML CONVERGENCE?
John
I have followed this debate with interest
and given it some thought over recent days.
I think you are right and we will need to
develop several new EML messages to handle all of the required linkages to
provide the integration we obviously need. However I think we need to try
and identify whether there will be any specific integration requirements so
that we can try and resolve the issue with a clear and unambiguous solution to
suit all.
Best
wishes
Roy Hill
Director Research and Innovation
OPT2VOTE
Ltd
Tel:
02871 371111
Email: rhill@opt2vote.com
All opinions expressed are my own.
All emails have been scanned with Norton
Antivirus
-----------------------------------------------------
From: John Borras
[mailto:johnaborras@yahoo.co.uk]
Sent: 25 July 2008 14:52
To:
Subject: [election-services] Fw:
VIP/EML CONVERGENCE?
This recent exchange seems to confirm to me that we will need some new
EML message(s) to handle the linkage between voter address and precinct, and
precinct and polling station. What say you?
Regards
John
M. +44 (0)7976 157745
Skype: gov3john
----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Aaron B Strauss <aaronbs@gmail.com>
To: John <johnaborras@yahoo.co.uk>
Sent: Friday, 25 July, 2008 2:24:22 PM
Subject: Re: VIP/EML CONVERGENCE?
VIP: only from state
info. To come up with a complete, 50-state solution, other third
parties (e.g., Google, Vote411) must rely on other sources such as
public voter files.
Yes, voters input their address -- sorry that I didn't make that clear
in the previous email.
Aaron
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 9:17 AM, John <johnaborras@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Aaron
>
> Where do you collect this additional data from - the State EMS or from
> other sources?
>
> Having got this additional data how would it be used by the third
> party to answer a voter who didn't know their precinct? Would the
> voter input their address and the system then have the necessary
> functionality to match that address to a precinct?
>
> John
>
> On Jul 25, 2:04 pm, "Aaron B Strauss" <aaro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Most of this is absolutely correct. However, third-party solutions
>> never rely on (potential) voters knowing their precinct in order to
>> find their polling location. VIP's solution to this is to collect
>> three things:
>>
>> 1) A mapping of street segments into precincts.
>> 2) A mapping of precincts into polling locations
>> 3) Information about the polling locations (i.e., address, directions)
>>
>> Other third-parties collect publicly-available voter files (laws on
>> how public vary from state to state) and use the addresses in the
>> voter file to match addresses to precincts to polling locations.
>>
>> Aaron
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 5:22 AM, John <johnabor...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> > Aaron/Doug
>>
>> > Following our recent telecon we've been having a few internal
>> > discussions about how we would manipulate EML to meet your needs,
>> > particulary the handling of addresses and geography. Daivd
Webber is
>> > working on a demo solution and we hope to be able to show you
that in
>> > the near future. In the meantime can you clarify some
aspects of the
>> > VIP functionality for my benefit at least please.
>>
>> > As I understand it States will provide a subset of data from
their
>> > systems to third parties to use in their outlets to the
public. These
>> > subsets of data will not hold any voter information and will only
>> > provide a basic set of functionality to enable the third parties
to
>> > answer straight-forward questions or direct voters to the correct
>> > locations for accurate and specific information.
>>
>> > For example to answer the voter's enquiry of " Am I
registered to
>> > vote" the third party's system will only provide the URL of
the
>> > State's website where that particular question can be answered
using
>> > specifc voter credentials. The third party system will not
answer the
>> > question directly as it doesn't hold the voter registration data.
>>
>> > To answer the question "Which polling station do I use"
the third
>> > party system will provide a list of polling station(s) for each
>> > precinct and will assume the voter knows which precinct they
belong
>> > to. Basic data about polling station open times will be
provided with
>> > the address information. The third party's system will not
provide an
>> > enquiry system that matches the voter's address with the
appropriate
>> > polling station. If the voter doesn't know their precinct
they would
>> > be referred to the State's website where that information can be
>> > obtained by an address matching process again using some form of
>> > credential.
>>
>> > Other questions about absentee voting etc will be answered with
the
>> > URL of the State's website where that information is avialable.
>>
>> > So am I right to assume that the third parties will only provide
basic
>> > data and pointers to authorative sources rather than
sophisticated
>> > functionality to do address matching and voter matching?
>>
>> > John
>>
>> >
Not happy with your email address?
Get the one
you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at Yahoo!
Not happy with your email address?
Get the one
you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at Yahoo!
Not happy with your email address?
Get the one you really want
- millions of new email addresses available now at Yahoo!