[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [election-services] Much better news on 120 v 230 / 330
David Just to be clear what you are proposing: On the 120-330 Compare sheet all the entries in orange would be
added to the 330 and then we delete the 120? We keep the 230 but add a Source item? What happens to the 130? John From: David RR Webber (XML)
[mailto:david@drrw.info] Team, OK - went back and reviewed everything and significantly improved
the dictionary compare XSLT processing. Adding in the 230 definately completes the other pieces of the
puzzle. Attached Excel spreadsheet. I believe this shows we are very close - most items do indeed
match as Paul thought. Reviewing the 120 to combined worksheet - following
suggestions: - 178 - we add a Source node to 230 and 330 - that tracks
original source of content. I am seeing that the remaining items in the 120 relate to physical
transfer of content - and hence are more of a "result report" that a
batch process would produce - rather than something we should perscribe into
the standard. Typically this would all be external to the EML - a results
report - that a SQL or similar process e.g a DIFF) would produce. Thoughts everyone? Thanks, DW |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]