OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

election-services message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [election-services] Much better news on 120 v 230 / 330



Just to be clear what you are proposing:


On the 120-330 Compare sheet all the entries in orange would be added to the 330 and then we delete the 120?


We keep the 230 but add a Source item?


What happens to the 130?





From: David RR Webber (XML) [mailto:david@drrw.info]
Sent: 31 March 2009 20:51
To: eml
Subject: [election-services] Much better news on 120 v 230 / 330




OK - went back and reviewed everything and significantly improved the dictionary compare XSLT processing.


Adding in the 230 definately completes the other pieces of the puzzle.


Attached Excel spreadsheet.


I believe this shows we are very close - most items do indeed match as Paul thought. 


Reviewing the 120 to combined worksheet - following suggestions:


- 178 - we add a Source node to 230 and 330 - that tracks original source of content.


I am seeing that the remaining items in the 120 relate to physical transfer of content - and hence are more of a "result report" that a batch process would produce - rather than something we should perscribe into the standard.  Typically this would all be external to the EML - a results report - that a SQL or similar process e.g a DIFF) would produce.


Thoughts everyone?


Thanks, DW

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]