RE: [election-services] Election Systems and Standards Paper - NISTworkshop

["David RR Webber \(XML\)" <david@drrw.info>]

Mary,

To be clear - these are draft materials ONLY - not formally approved.

A committee is permitted to distinguish work as such - and obviously presenters need to make clear this is not formally approved work - just work produced by members of the TC.

For example this email itself is not formally approved by the TC - but I'm allowed to post it here - and the archives will show it as eminating from the OASIS TC as the source.

We just need to be clear on when something is formally approved work product - and the document repository has that clearly distinguished.

Similarly if Laurent submits a presentation - that has not been formally approved by a TC either.

Thanks, DW

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [election-services] Election Systems and Standards Paper -
NIST workshop
From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joehall@berkeley.edu>
Date: Wed, August 26, 2009 1:44 pm
To: Mary McRae <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>
Cc: "David RR Webber (XML)" <david@drrw.info>, eml
<election-services@lists.oasis-open.org>, CAM OASIS TC
<cam@lists.oasis-open.org>, Laurent Liscia
<laurent.liscia@oasis-open.org>

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Mary McRae<mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> wrote:
> If this is to be submitted on behalf of the TC and identified as work of the
> TC, please make sure that the TC has voted to approve the document as such.

Yes, this concerns me for any submission purporting to come from the
TC. I don't think any of us have had adequate time to look either of
the submissions over. best, Joe

--
Joseph Lorenzo Hall
ACCURATE Postdoctoral Research Associate
UC Berkeley School of Information
Princeton Center for Information Technology Policy
http://josephhall.org/