[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [election-services] EML v6 CHANGES - TC MEETING
For the "spoilt" naming issue, we essentially want something that communicates "needs human intervention", no? What about "unclear" or "indeterminate"? For the "Do not see any provision for control contests." issue, isn't this just a contingent contest setup (where one contest depends on the selection made in a previous one)? I don't understand the practical need, if not. Maybe this is getting at choices presented on the ballot that aren't actual votes (like a straight-party selection choice). best, Joe -- Joseph Lorenzo Hall ACCURATE Postdoctoral Research Associate UC Berkeley School of Information Princeton Center for Information Technology Policy http://josephhall.org/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]