Re: EML AUDIT PROGRESS

[Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joehall@berkeley.edu>]

On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 4:12 AM, John Borras <johnaborras@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
>
>
> Now that the USA elections are out of the way, have you been able to make
> any progress on the audit requirements for EML v6.1 please?

I have been slammed with research this entire month and it doesn't
look like it will get better soon.  I know Neal has also been wrapped
up in CO post-election auditing work, although he may have more time
going forward than I do.  I'll touch base with Neal soon. best, Joe

> IEEE/P1622 and NIST are planning to hold a workshop in February to
> essentially decide which standard to pursue for their solution for the
> UOCAVA project and we will be invited to demonstrate how EML could fit the
> bill.  NIST want a P1622 draft standard to be available by June 2011 for use
> in the next presidential elections so their work is now gaining real
> momentum and I would want EML to be there in the forefront of it all.
>
>
>
> Do we need to have a conference call to discuss progress, issues, next steps
> etc?
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> John
>
>



-- 
Joseph Lorenzo Hall
ACCURATE Postdoctoral Research Associate
UC Berkeley School of Information
Princeton Center for Information Technology Policy
http://josephhall.org/