[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [emergency-adopt] EDXL Product Directory - Vendor Outreach Updated
Yes for both but in different meeting notes. The decision for EDXL-CAP was made in the F2F EM-TC meeting held during the TCIP conference 2010. The decision for CAP 2.0 to require the DE was made over a year ago but would need to search meeting notes to find the precise time. Elysa At 05:38 AM 6/24/2010, McGarry, Donald P. wrote: >Is that a "yes" for both 1 & 2? > >-Don >Office: 315-838-2669 >Cell: 703-595-9375 >dmcgarry@mitre.org > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Elysa Jones [mailto:ejones@warningsystems.com] >Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 6:12 AM >To: McGarry, Donald P.; rexb@starbourne.com; THOMAS FERRENTINO >Cc: WernerJoerg; Camille L.Osterloh; emergency-adopt@lists.oasis-open.org >Subject: RE: [emergency-adopt] EDXL Product >Directory - Vendor Outreach Updated > >Yes, that was decided and is included in our minutes from that meeting. Elysa > >At 05:05 AM 6/24/2010, McGarry, Donald P. wrote: > >1. I was under the impression that at the NIEM face to face we agreed > >that from then on "CAP" > >would be referred to as "EDXL-CAP" > >2. I was also under the impression that CAP 2.0 would require use of the DE. > > > >-Don > >Office: 315-838-2669 > >Cell: 703-595-9375 > >dmcgarry@mitre.org > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Rex Brooks [mailto:rexb@starbourne.com] > >Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 8:55 PM > >To: THOMAS FERRENTINO > >Cc: WernerJoerg; Camille L.Osterloh; > >emergency-adopt@lists.oasis-open.org > >Subject: Re: [emergency-adopt] EDXL Product Directory - Vendor Outreach > >Updated > > > >We are firing up CAP 2.0 so this is certainly something that should be > >clearly detailed in that new version. However, remember, we will need > >to have a standalone CAP as well as a fully fledged EDXL family member > >CAP. > >It's a spectrum or range, not a choice of one or the other. > > > >Cheers, > >Rex > > > >THOMAS FERRENTINO wrote: > > > Werner's comment suggestion is a good one (I believe). It does not > > > explicitly rename CAP as EDXL-CAP but it does place CAP within the > > > EDXL family. This may be a good way to gravitate slowly towards the > > > EDXL-CAP 1.2 re-titling of the CAP standard. > > > E.g. > > > > > > "Vendors may provide a description of their product and identify > > > specific EDXL standards which are supported (CAP, DE, HAVE, and/or RM)." > > > > > > Tom > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On *Wed, 6/23/10, Osterloh, Camille L. > > > /<CAMILLE.L.OSTERLOH@saic.com>/* wrote: > > > > > > > > > From: Osterloh, Camille L. <CAMILLE.L.OSTERLOH@saic.com> > > > Subject: RE: [emergency-adopt] EDXL Product Directory - Vendor > > > Outreach Updated > > > To: "Joerg, Werner" <Werner.Joerg@iem.com> > > > Cc: emergency-adopt@lists.oasis-open.org > > > Date: Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 11:23 AM > > > > > > Werner, Based on your comment below I did go back and pull > > > relevant section from notes captured in EM-TC 9-29-09 minutes. I > > > donât see a decision to change any > referencences os of âCAPâ to > > > âEDXL-CAPÃL-CAPâ > bââ¬Â but there is a motion to referference âEDXL > > > inclcluding CAPâ fo for all > communication about the standardds. > > > > > > Here is relevant portion of the meeting notes > > > > > > */CAP and the EDXL family of Standards. /* > > > > > > /â¦Since this has been the process for all SSttandards to date > > > beginning with CAP and including EDXL-DE, EDXL-RM, EDXL-HAVE, the > > > group discussed the need to single CAP out rather than include it > > > in the EDXL "family." Discussion included the fact that CAP is > > > transport agnostic and maybe should be considered separately for > > > that reason. However, the others are really transport agnostic. > > > CAP was done before the EDXL name was coined and the process > > > formalized at DHS S&T. However, it was basically the same idea. > > > After further discussion on the topic, *TGrapes made and RBrooks > > > seconded a motion that EM-TC begin using "EDXL including CAP" for > > > all communication about our Standards. All agreed.*/ > > > > > > If we need to adjust further please let me know. Thanks, > > > -Camille > > > > > > *Camille L. Osterloh* | SAIC > > > > > > NIMS STEP Task Lead | > > > > > > Test Manager | ILSPG > > > > > > phone: 606.274.2019 | fax 606.274.2025 > > > > > > email: osterlohc@saic.com > > > > > > <http://us.mc840.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=osterlohc@saic.com> > > > > > > Please consider the environment before printing this email. > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > -- > > > -- > > > > > > *From:* Werner.Joerg@ieminc.com [mailto:Werner.Joerg@ieminc.com] > > > *On Behalf Of *Joerg, Werner > > > *Sent:* Friday, May 28, 2010 5:37 PM > > > *To:* Osterloh, Camille L.; emergency-adopt@lists.oasis-open.org > > > *Subject:* RE: [emergency-adopt] EDXL Product Directory - Vendor > > > Outreach Updated > > > > > > Camille, > > > > > > thanks for the updated text - looks good, and to the point. > > > > > > I do have ambivalent feelings about the reference to CAP: on one > > > hand it best is known under that name; on the other hand the EM-TC > > > had decided at the Baltimore F2F to use the designation EDXL-CAP > > > henceforth. > > > > > > My first idea would be to simply replace all occurrences of CAP > > > with EDXL-CAP. On second thought however I'd like to suggest that > > > we rewrite the first sentence of the 2nd paragraph in a more > > > "viral" manner as > > > > > > "Vendors may provide a description of their product and identify > > > specific EDXL standards which are supported (CAP, DE, HAVE, and/or > > > RM)." > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Werner > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > -- > > > -- > > > > > > *From:* Osterloh, Camille L. [mailto:CAMILLE.L.OSTERLOH@saic.com] > > > *Sent:* Fri 5/28/2010 11:12 AM > > > *To:* emergency-adopt@lists.oasis-open.org > > > *Subject:* [emergency-adopt] EDXL Product Directory - Vendor > > > Outreach Updated > > > > > > Here is an updated vendor outreach email based on discussion in EM-TC > > > meeting today. Carol Geyer is POC for vendor questions and her email > > > address has been added. > > > > > > > > > The OASIS Emergency Management Adoption Technical Committee invites > > > vendors to register with the new EDXL Product Directory - > > > http://oasis-emergency.org/products. The directory provides a > > > searchable > > > listing of products implementing the > EDXL suite of standards including > > > CAP. > > > > > > Vendors may provide a description of their product and identify > > > specific > > > standards which are supported (CAP, EDXL-DE, EDXL-HAVE, and/or > > > EDXL-RM). > > > The directory also allows vendors to identify participation in > > > interoperability demonstrations and the NIMS Supporting Technology > > > Evaluation Program (NIMS STEP). There are no fees associated with > > > listing a product. > > > > > > To take advantage of this opportunity please visit > > > http://oasis-emergency.org/products and select the "Add Product" > > > link in > > > the upper right corner of the page. You > will be directed to the Log-in > > > page to create an account. Upon registration you will receive a reply > > > email with a password and initial instructions. > > > > > > If you have any questions please contact Carol Geyer at > > > Carol.Geyer@oasis-open.org. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > <Signature> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > > > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > > > > > > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.p > > > hp > > > > > > >-- > >Rex Brooks > >President, CEO > >Starbourne Communications Design > >GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison > >Berkeley, CA 94702 > >Tel: 510-898-0670 > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > >generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > >https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]