Let’s get Chet to weigh in on this. I’m good with whatever is decided as long as we are within the OASIS guidelines and don’t create MORE work for ourselves as this terms list grows. Thanks! Elysa
From: emergency-cap@lists.oasis-open.org <emergency-cap@lists.oasis-open.org> On Behalf Of Rex Brooks
Sent: Friday, August 7, 2020 1:56 PM
To: Scott M. Robertson <Scott.M.Robertson@kp.org>; emergency-cap@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [emergency-cap] Proposal on versioning the CAP Terms committee note
Looks good to me. Could this be inserted at the end of Section 5? as a specific kind of versioning for the intermittent change versioning separate from Appendix C revision history? I would suggest also recording major revision numbers in Appendix C, with an inter-document reference to the Section 5 versioning where we might want to record more detailed changes including new List terms which would make the 4th column, Changes Made, of Appendix C longer than necessary.
Cheers,
Rex
Cheers,
Rex
On 8/7/2020 10:54 AM, Scott M. Robertson wrote:
Unless OASIS policy doesn’t allow this …
Regarding versioning of the CAP Terms committee not for updates to the CAP Event Terms List: what if we use minor numbers (to the right of the decimal point) for List (and editorial) updates, and major revision numbers for document content changes?
Initial publication
v1.0
First List update
v1.1
List update and some editorial fixes
v1.2
…
V1.3 … v1.n
Substantive content update
v2.0
Just a thought
Scott M Robertson
PharmD, RPh, FHL7, GISP, CISSP
Principal Technology Consultant
Kaiser Permanente
Technology Risk Office | Health IT Strategy & Policy
310-200-0231----------
kp.org/thrive
NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them. Thank you.
