[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Comments to Hospital AVailability Exchange (HAVE) from North Carolina, NEMSIS, and NASEMSO
Greetings, Comments provided in this email are voiced from the following entities: the National EMS Information System (www.NEMSIS.org), the North Carolina's Hospital Preparedness Program (www.ncems.org), and the National Association of State EMS Officials (www.NASEMSO.org <http://www.nasemso.org/> ). These comments represent a detailed analysis and review of the proposed standard with respect to use within the EMS and ESF-8 functions of state government. Although the structure of the EDXL is solid, there are many key data elements which are missing and the definitions are often ambiguous. Please see detailed comments below: 1. The following data elements must be better defined for standardized data. * Triage Patient Types including TriageRed, TriageYellow, and TriageGreen. Hospitals are not familiar with the field triage colors. The implementation of the SMARTT system (State Medical Asset Resource Tracking Tool) which attempts to follow the HAvBED guidelines has better defined these color based triage categories. The brief definitions state that a Red Patient is an ICU level patient, a Yellow Patient is a hospital floor bed type of patient, and a Green Patient is considered in need of care but an outpatient. Please contact me if you would like the full definitions. * The definition of "Available Beds" must be better defined. Typically this is a staffed bed capable of accepting a patient at the time the data is collected. This would indicate that there is currently not a patient in the bed. The HAvBED definitions are acceptable in this area but not included in this OASIS document. * There is a need for a more detailed definition of Bed Types. Although these definitions do include some detail, there is still too little detail for hospitals to implement independently and consistently. This is also based on the rollout history of SMARTT. * The definition of CapacityStatus is to vague. Please better define VacantAvailable and NotAvailable. * The definition of BaselineCount is to vague. Please define baseline. * The definition of ClinicalStatus is vague. What is Level-1 Surge Conditions, etc. * The definition of DeconCapacity is not helpful. It should document the number of ambulatory and non-ambulatory patients which can be decontaminated over time (typically an hour) * MorgueCapacity should document the number of bodies it can accept similar to bed status numbers. * Staffing is poorly defined. Please define so a quantitative measurement can be obtained or the data can be understood. * Status of Supplies is poorly defined. Please define so a quantitative measurement can be obtained or the data can be understood. What is the difference between facility and clinical operations? Is a bed part of the facility or clinical? 2. The following data elements either need to be expanded or added to provide more disaster or emergency operations information: * BedType should be expanded to include the following types: o Psychiatric Pediatric (99% of psychiatric beds will only accept adults and our most significant challenge is finding adolescent psychiatric beds). We recommend splitting Psychiatric to Psychiatric-Adult and Psychiatric-Pediatric. o Neonatal ICU Beds should be added. This reflects a specialty area not covered by Pediatric ICUs o Nursery Beds (non-Neonatal ICU) are a unique asset and skill set. o Rehabilitation/Long Term Care beds are an asset different from Medical/Surgical beds. Many hospitals have this capability but it should be tracked separately. * ServiceCoverageStatus should be expanded to include the following: o Cardiology should be divided to Cardiology-Invasive and Cardiology-Non-invasive o Dialysis should be added o Emergency Department should be added o Hyperbaric Chamber should be added o Neurology should be divided to Neurology-Invasive and Neurology-Non-invasive o Obstetrics/Gynecology should be divided to with and without Labor and Delivery o Ophthalmology should be added o Pediatrics should be added o Psychiatry should be divided between adult and pediatric o Surgery specialties should be monitored including: Adult General, Cardiothoracic, Facial, Hand, Neurosurgery, Pediatric, Re-Implantation, Spine, and Vascular o Transport Services including Air and Ground Specialty Care Transport Services should be added o Trauma Center Status should be added. Typically this would be Level 1, 2, 3, or 4 * HospitalFacilityStatus should be expanded to include the following: o ED Visits should be monitored similar to admissions, discharges, and deaths. o The number or supply of personnel protection equipment should be monitored. This was key with the SARS outbreak and its management. This should include Level A, B, and C suits. It should also track N95 masks at the various sizes. o Pharmaceuticals Caches should be tracked. This included the following drugs: a. Atropine b. British Anti-Lewisite (BAL) c. Ciprofloxacin d. Cyanide Kit or Cyanocoalbumin e. Doxycycline f. Diazepam and Lorazepam g. Mark 1 Kits h. Oseltamivir (Tamiflu) and Zanamivir (Relenza) i. Pralidoxime (2-PAM) * There should be some capability within the EDXL to include some custom data within a standardized presentation. This allows additional data to be exchanged without breaking the EDXL schema and structure. This would be the equivalent to a comment filed on a form or database. This is often best implemented with two data elements. One for the subject and one for the data associated with the subject. This is also a many to one allowing multiple comments to be sent with a difference subject. Thank you for the opportunity to provide these comments. My contact information is below should you need further clarification. Greg Mears ________________________________ Greg Mears, MD Associate Professor North Carolina EMS Medical Director The EMS Performance Improvement Center Department of Emergency Medicine University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill 100 Market Street Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27516 919-843-0201 <mailto:gdm@med.unc.edu> gdm@med.unc.edu
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]