[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [emergency-comment] EDXL-DE v1.0 comment for next public review period
Tim, I confirm these issues as you reported them. Attached ZIP contains HTML documentation extracted from the EDXL-DE XSD that details the rules and elements concerned. Also when you run the CAM template (enclosed) against the XML samples in the ZIP - the errors are reported directly. (I've not included the CAP content details however - as those are separate). Thanks, DW -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [emergency-comment] EDXL-DE v1.0 comment for next public review period From: "Gilmore, Timothy" <TIMOTHY.D.GILMORE@saic.com> Date: Wed, May 07, 2008 3:40 pm To: <emergency-comment@lists.oasis-open.org> 1. In the Oasis Standard EDXL-DE v1.0, 1 May 2006, on page 10 of 42 it lists sub-elements "keyXMLContent" and "embeddedXMLContent" with no asterix meaning they are not multiple instances only. They are also optional because they are not in bold. However on page 29 of 42 it states they are both optional with multiple instances. 2. The first example is missing the "required" combinedConfidentiality element. 3. The second example has the "required" combinedConfidentiality element in an incorrect location. It also uses incorrect element name usage of explicitAddress sub-elements of explicitAddressScheme and explicitAddressValue. It incorrectly lists them as just Scheme and Value. Thanks, Timothy Gilmore NIMS Support Center Test and Evaluation Engineer Somerset, KY 42503 606-274-2063
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]