I have a few key items that I would like to discuss in our 4pm EDT meeting today. I believe we are at the point that the schema will only have very minor changes and that the document now becomes the key.
Here are the items that I would like to discuss in our meeting (please reach out and let me know if you have items to add):
- EDXLString - we have discussed the use of this data type as opposed to xs:string. I don't believe this will work for comments.
- OperationsList - the new approach has a ValueListType (ValueListURI, Value pair) that can use a taxonomy.
- Location - MAJOR refactor - removing the EDXLGeoPoliticalLocationType and replacing with address (XAL) and and geoCoordinates, which supports a required WGS84 geometry element and optional non-WGS84 SRS geometries.
- RECONSIDER FacilityCapacityType - what was intended here?
- REVIEW ServiceListItemType/capacity - seems redundant.
- REVIEW ServiceListItemType/code - what was intended here with the value (+uom)?REVIEW ServiceListCodeDefaultType - not being used - should it be?
- REVIEW ResourceQuantityType - the resourceKind (ResourceKindType) doesn't make sense unless we have a comprehensive list of resource types.
I look forward to hearing from you in our 4pm EDT meeting today.
cheers,
Darrell
--
Darrell O'Donnell, P.Eng.
OASIS Member (volunteer) - www.oasis-open.org
OASIS EM TC, RIM SC - Member
OASIS EM HAVE SC - Co-Chair
