Re: Important EDXL-HAVE-v2.0 Question

On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 12:39 PM rexbroo <rexb@starbourne.com> wrote:

Hi Chet, Everyone,

Per our discussion during today's Emergency Member Section Steering Committee, we want to approve a new EDXL-HAVE-v2.0-CS with this non-substantive title change. Elysa is going to be traveling to remote worksites around the globe for the next three weeks at least, and I'd like to get this teed up during this time. So as a first step, I will create a new working draft over the course of next week and post it to HAVE SC Documents by next Tuesday, February 19, 2019.

I'm asking here that members of the HAVE SC and any interested party review the working draft document to ensure that no other previously unnoticed changes are needed. Please send any such changes to me for inclusion in a new working draft, if needed, by Friday, February 22, 2019.

Elysa, could you please schedule a HAVE SC meeting for Monday March 4, 2019 at 12:00 p.m. noon ET. Hopefully, we should be able to vote on releasing the latest working draft to the TC for approval as a new Committee Specification Draft,Â allowing us to request a Special Majority Vote advancing the document to Committee Specification status. This TC approval could occur at either the March 5, or 19, 2019 TC Meetings.

Chet, did I miss anything in here?

This is a typically optimistic schedule, but we will adapt as we can,

Cheers,
Rex

On 2/12/2019 12:40 PM, Chet Ensign wrote:
Hi Scott,Â

No, errata are limited to OASIS Standards, mainly because it is easy enough to approve a new CS.Â

I agree that if you are going to go through the approval process, another look is a good idea.Â

I'll stand by for all you to let me know when we need to take the next steps.Â

Best,Â

/chet
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 2:28 PM Scott M. Robertson <Scott.M.Robertson@kp.org> wrote:
An unfortunate oversight.Â Apparently we (I) read the content, but not the title.Â I will admit that I didnât notice it until Rex pointed it out this morning.

Â

Chet, is an errata possible?Â If not, we will need to the CS02 path.

Â

For either CS02 or errata, I suggest that we first to an editorial-only (offline) review.Â If we have one (glaring) edit, we probably have others.

Â

I will contact HL7.Â For either route (CS02 or errata), HL7 will need to update the copy in their standards library.Â What they have does say âProposedâ.

Â

-Scott

Â

Scott M Robertson

Principal Technology Consultant

PharmD, RPh, FHL7, GISP, CISSP

Â

Kaiser Permanente
Technology Risk Office | Health IT Strategy & Policy
310-200-0231 (office)

tro.kp.org

----------
kp.org/thrive

Â

From: Chet Ensign <chet.ensign@oasis-open.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 10:45 AM
To: Elysa Jones <elysajones@yahoo.com>
Cc: Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>; Scott M. Robertson <Scott.M.Robertson@kp.org>; Paul Knight <paul.knight@oasis-open.org>
Subject: Re: Important EDXL-HAVE-v2.0 Question

Â

Caution: This email came from outside Kaiser Permanente. Do not open attachments or click on links if you do not recognize the sender.

Hi Elysa,Â

Â

The problem is that it is now published and announced. Once specs are published, I don't change the content because they have become part of the historical record.Â

Â

No one told us that needed to change. The CS was there and in fact was reapproved while awaiting go-ahead from HL7 to fix a non-material error.Â

Â

What we could do I suppose is approve a new CS with that as the non-material change and then I can publish it as CS02. Do you want to do that?Â

Â

/chetÂ

Â

Â

Â
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 1:26 PM Elysa Jones <elysajones@yahoo.com> wrote:
I agree it should be changed.Â That is what I thought we were working toward.Â I understand we had to say âproposedâ until HL7 agreed but assumed then the âproposedâ word would be removed.Â I donât understand why that canât be done.

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

On Tuesday, February 12, 2019, 12:23 PM, rexbroo <rexb@starbourne.com> wrote:
Thanks for the clarification Chet.

We will carry on. I request that Elysa and Scott weigh in on changing it on the standards. I think it should be changed, but that's just one of three.

Thanks Again.

Much Appreciated,
Rex

On 2/12/2019 10:13 AM, Chet Ensign wrote:
Hi Rex - Unfortunately, there isn't anything I can do about that now. The document was approved with that designation by both the TC (twice) and by the HL7 folks. Now that it is published and part of the public record, I don't go back and change it. I can fix it on the standards page (https://www.oasis-open.org/standards#edxl-have-20) and I can fix it when you next approve an update to the work.Â

Â
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 12:13 PM rexbroo <rexb@starbourne.com> wrote:
Hi Chet as I was updating the EM TC and EM Adoption TC websites, I noticed that the document at http://docs.oasis-open.org/emergency/edxl-have/v2.0/cs01/edxl-have-v2.0-cs01.doc says that it is a "Proposed HL7 Informative Document" and it shouldn't be Proposed. I've checked this with Elysa and Scott Robertson and they agree.

Thanks,
Rex
-- 
Rex Brooks
Starbourne Communications Design
Email: rexb@starbourne.com
GeoAddress:
1361 Addison St. Apt. A
Berkeley, CA 94702
Phone: 510-898-0670 
Â

Virus-free. www.avast.com
Â

--

/chetÂ
----------------

Chet Ensign

Chief Technical Community Steward
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
http://www.oasis-open.org

Primary: +1 973-996-2298
Mobile: +1 201-341-1393Â
-- 
Rex Brooks
Starbourne Communications Design
Email: rexb@starbourne.com
GeoAddress:
1361 Addison St. Apt. A
Berkeley, CA 94702
Phone: 510-898-0670 
Â

--

/chetÂ
----------------

Chet Ensign

Chief Technical Community Steward
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
http://www.oasis-open.org

Primary: +1 973-996-2298
Mobile: +1 201-341-1393Â
NOTICE TO RECIPIENT:Â If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or disclosing its contents.Â If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them.Â Thank you.
--

/chetÂ
----------------

Chet Ensign

Chief Technical Community Steward
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
http://www.oasis-open.org

Primary: +1 973-996-2298
Mobile: +1 201-341-1393Â
-- 
Rex Brooks
Starbourne Communications Design
Email: rexb@starbourne.com
GeoAddress:
1361 Addison St. Apt. A
Berkeley, CA 94702
Phone: 510-898-0670 

emergency-have message