[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [emergency-msg] EDXL-AT & Situational Awareness
It sounds like an agenda item for the F2F to me. Patti Patti Iles Aymond, PhD Senior Scientist, Research & Development Innovative Emergency Management, Inc. Managing Risk in a Complex World 8555 United Plaza Blvd. Suite 100 Baton Rouge, LA 70809 (225) 952-8228 (phone) (225) 952-8122 (fax) -----Original Message----- From: Renato Iannella [mailto:renato@nicta.com.au] Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 6:17 PM To: Emergency_Mgt_Msg_SC; emergency-if@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [emergency-msg] EDXL-AT & Situational Awareness On 17 Mar 2007, at 22:14, Rex Brooks wrote: > If at all possible, even if it means spending a lot of time in a > crash project, we should build EDXL-RIM before or concurrently with > any new specs. We need to get that EDXL-RIM sucker done yesterday! I think this is most critical at the moment. My feelings are that we currently haver 4 specs that, to some extent, are incompatible. There is no "common framework" between them and no consistent mechanisms for describing areas, people, orgs, event types and value lists (etc). I would recommend to the TC that the EDX-RIM become the next priority item. And that all future specs (including updates to the current 4) be based on the RIM. Cheers... Renato Iannella NICTA IEM CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION PLEASE READ OUR NOTICE: http://www.iem.com/e_mail_confidentiality_notice.html
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]