[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Groups - DRAFT-06-21-11-Minutes-IF-Subcommittee.doc (DRAFT-06-21-11-Minutes-IF-Subcommittee.doc) uploaded
Please review these minutes from the June 21st, 2011 meeting of the Infrastructure Framework Subcommittee for approval at our next meeting, subject to any specified changes. Thanks. -- Jeff Waters The document named DRAFT-06-21-11-Minutes-IF-Subcommittee.doc (DRAFT-06-21-11-Minutes-IF-Subcommittee.doc) has been submitted by Jeff Waters to the EM Infrastructure Framework SC document repository. Document Description: This document contains the minutes for the Infrastructure Framework Subcommittee meeting of June 21st, 2011. At this meeting, the members discussed the following topics: 1. TOPIC: What is the status of the common components and should we be waiting for those before proceeding with DE documentation? (Answer: OASIS staff should have common types and CIQ profile approved within a week or two, and the EM TC still needs to submit the GML Micro when a few technical details are resolved hopefully this week. We can proceed with our DE draft, but problems can result if we proceed too far without the official versions. ) 2. TOPIC: When and how much testing should be done on our specs? (Answer: Historically, the amount and extent of testing depends on the resources of the members in a given committee and OASIS does not formally take on the testing role; however, the consensus is that testing should be recommended and defined in a process to include recruiting testers through the Adoption TC beginning as early as a working draft and schema is available. Early testing will focus on whether key features have been adequately implemented and later testing on robustness and scalability. ) 3. TOPIC: Do we have a smart routing example that shows the ability to use the DE to ensure all appropriate people receive messages based on their roles? (Answer: Yes, the example utilizes CAMEL, HERMIT and OWL to show how an externally managed ontology can enable appropriate recipients to be inferred from a recipientRole value specified in the DE. The sample small ontology shows that recipients whose roles are semantically similar but defined differently, for example as TSO Events versus OASIS Incidents, can all receive the appropriate messages because the ontology defines which classes and roles are equivalent.) View Document Details: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=42624 Download Document: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/42624/DRAFT-06-21-11-Minutes-IF-Subcommittee.doc PLEASE NOTE: If the above links do not work for you, your email application may be breaking the link into two pieces. You may be able to copy and paste the entire link address into the address field of your web browser. -OASIS Open Administration
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]