[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Resolution path for gml to move SitReps and DE forward
Folks, Getting this larger meeting together has proven difficult, so I propose we resolve this in a more expedient way via email, followed by a vote at the upcoming EM-TC meeting. Jeff Waters gave me a call and we discussed coming to agreement on the critical path items – the GML micro - and once under our belts then moving forward in parallel SC’s with DE 2.0 and SitReps followed by HAVE 2.0. To our knowledge, the two issues below are the only outstanding ones in critical path. If others exist, please advise. But under this assumption, we believe that the revised spec document and new/revised schema posted by Lew Leinenweber today answers both of these issues. Request that you review that posting, and advise the group if you feel any significant issues are left hanging. On the EM-TC Tuesday July 5, we propose discussion on this topic and a vote to accept this as the recommended approach at this juncture. Positive outcome will allow the other efforts to move forward in parallel. I humbly suggest we all remember two things during this process. One, that our target audience for these standards drive the need for simplicity, possibly above all other things. Where the OGC standards are incredible for more intricate applications, our emergency/disaster users need simplicity and ease of implementation. Secondly, we have a process in place that allows nimble changes to these common components so that further discussions and changes may be addressed as we move forward.
For my part, I will go ahead and re-engage the EDXL-SitRep subcommittee calls following the next TC call so that we can complete final tasks and get it to committee draft. Thanks everyone, Tim Grapes Evotec (703) 304-4829 If I had six hours to cut down a tree, I’d spend four hours sharpening the ax. From: Timothy Grapes [mailto:tgrapes@evotecinc.com] From: Timothy Grapes [mailto:tgrapes@evotecinc.com] All, please let me know your constrains or preferences M-F of next week at 3PM EST. Thanks, Tim Grapes Evotec (703) 304-4829 If I had six hours to cut down a tree, I’d spend four hours sharpening the ax. From: McGarry, Donald P. [mailto:dmcgarry@mitre.org] Hi All- I wanted to summarize what I think we need to do before we can get everything out the door…Please add/comment as needed and perhaps we can have a short chat to figure this out. 2. GML Micro a. Decide whether to add posList to GMLMicro or change the example b. Approve the “wrapper” for edxl-gsf schema (attached) 3. SitReps a. Change the schema to use edxl-gsf.xsd b. Figure out where we need geo-location information and change to edxl-gsf c. Figure out where we need geopolitical-location information and figure out how to use CIQ appropriately there d. ICS Example – We have a draft that we are just working out a few minor issues with. I can show you an example soon. We will need to update this and the example XML files once a,b,c are complete. e. Final schema and example check / verification 4. DE 2.0: a. Change the schema to use edxl-gsf.xsd b. Confirm that the xlink solution that Jeff has graciously put together will “work” for the use cases presented about DEExt and linking content objects c. Fix the example files to match a,b,c |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]