[OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (EMFW-21) DE 2.0 No default lists for confidentiality, senderRole, recipientRole?

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/EMFW-21?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=29744#action_29744 ] 

Martena Gooch commented on EMFW-21:
-----------------------------------

Is classified/unclassified sufficient for default terms for
confidentiality? 

Yes. A concern was raised that these terms may
suggest that confidentiality is slanted toward government or Department of
Defense use, but that is not the case. Picking other terms raises its own
set of issues. The consensus opinion is that classified/unclassified is
generic and will encourage users to think about and select a more
appropriate list from the appropriate domain, without this standard picking
one over another.
 
Reference: 03-06-12-Minutes-IF-Subcommittee Meeting Notes 

----- 
Action Items for the IF Committee 

Add the default to schema(s) for Confidential --classified and unclassified 


> DE 2.0 No default lists for confidentiality, senderRole, recipientRole?
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: EMFW-21
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/EMFW-21
>             Project: OASIS EDXL Distribution Element
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Schema
>    Affects Versions: csprd01 - Public Review Draft #1
>         Environment: Glenn Pearson
>            Reporter: Jeff Waters
>             Fix For: csprd01 - Public Review Draft #1
>
>
> No default lists for confidentiality, senderRole, recipientRole?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira