[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [emergency-msg] Minutes for Mtg 08-24-06
Here are the Minutes of our last meeting, Please see PLEASE NOTE: below.
EM-Msg Meeting August 24, 2006 Minutes
We had a quorum, and the minutes for the previous meeting were accepted.
1 We accepted the Meeting Notes from the previous meeting.
2 We reviewed the ExampleMsgSemantics document Renato submitted and
the list of Standard Resource Messages Patti included in the last
update of the specification document.
We decided to combine the formats in a sample for a single
MessageType so that a listing for the first message would begin as
Section 3.2.1 Resource Request and be followed by 22.214.171.124. Overview
and Description combining Renato's overview text and the descriptive
text Patti assembled in the last version of the specification.
This would be followed by 126.96.36.199 Table of Message Elements as Renato
developed, with the addition of a fifth column for the EDXL_DE
Distribution Type associated with the MessageType from Patti's
listing. This will incude the numbered Rules as shown in Renato's
This will be followed by 188.8.131.52.Message Flow per Renato's sample.
This will be followed by 184.108.40.206. Resource Request DOM/Reference
Model (the name for which remains to be settled: see 3). We did not
make a final decision on whether this model will be carried over for
the final draft specification because we want to see how useful it
will be and how we might divide up the total number of specification
components for each MessageType, which is expanded considerably in
We also asked that an example .xsd XML Schema file be included in
this first full sample for a specific Message Type. We did not decide
that it should be included here or simply included with the other
Message Schemata in a single complete .xsd for the entire
specification, or if we should include each schema separately.
This set of work was handed off to Karen to work with Renato for the
next meeting in two weeks (which as of now, would be scheduled to
follow the TC meeting at 12:30 p.m. ET (US). PLEASE NOTE: We should
probably reschedule this for another Thursday Afternoon session
rather than ask Renato and Karen to attend a meeting at 2:30 a.m. ET
Australian time. It should also be noted that the updating of the
specification (not required for the next meeting) has now been handed
off to Renato. We expressed our gratitutde to Karen to extend to
Renato for taking on this set of tasks.
3 Lastly, we discussed changing the name of the DOM to something
like Reference Model and making it clearly understood that it is not
intended to be used for generating program code, even though it could
be translated into formal UML 2.0 and used that way. We tabled the
discussion with the understanding that we need to double check that
there is no OASIS requirement or mandate for including a DOM per se.
No one seems to think that there is, but we want to be certain.
The meeting adjourned.
Starbourne Communications Design
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
Berkeley, CA 94702
IEM CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION PLEASE READ OUR NOTICE: