[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [emergency-msg] Meeting Next Week?
I think we're good to go, Tim, So if you could schedule it for us, I would appreciate it muchly. Cheers, Rex At 4:03 PM -0500 1/3/07, Timothy Grapes wrote: >Hi everyone, >A Thursday call works for me. > >Thanks, > >Tim > >-----Original Message----- >From: Rex Brooks [mailto:rexb@starbourne.com] >Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 10:43 AM >To: emergency-msg@lists.oasis-open.org >Subject: [emergency-msg] Meeting Next Week? > >Hi Folks, > >We should have a meeting next week to get back in synch after the >holidays. The TC , the IF SC and the Adoption SC are all meeting next >Tuesday morning, so it would be crowded to squeeze our meeting into >that set of timeslots, plus we need to include Karen and Renato, if >he can manage it. > >So I suggest scheduling our next meeting for >Thursday Jan 11 at 4:00 to 5:00 p.m. EST. > >If that doesn't work for you, please pipe up here and we can discuss it. > >If we don't hear from anyone with conflicts for this, I would >appreciate it if Tim could schedule it for us. > >Also, I would appreciate it if anyone has a recollection of any other >message elements where the ContactInformation package needs to be >added other than the top level Resource Message unit for each message >type and in the ResponsibleParty in OwnershipInformation. > >In the top level I used the form Contact:ContactInformation but I am >wondering if it should just be ContactInformation: char since we >don't have a message element: Contact? > >I hesitated to call it ContactRole, (the previous name for the >relationship between the top level unit and the Contact Information >cluste). > >I did that to avoid repeating an element from further downstream in >the element chain. > >We may need a new label for the person sending the message, or >responsible for sending the message (like MessageContact or >MessageContactRole) to avoid having a term that is used in its own >definition which would have if we used either >ContactInformation:ContactInformation or >ContactRole:ContactInformation (in which Contact Role is a defining >characteristic with a specific list of types). > > I have attached my update of the main Element Reference Model so you >can see what I have done. I didn't want to update all of the rest of >the models until I am sure that this much is correctly aligned. > >I would also appreciate any discussion about whether we should >consider adding the ContactInformation package to the >ResponseInformation unit. My question is to those with more practical >on-the-ground experience than I have as to whether or not a person >other that the person sending a response type message would be the >contact for that information. I certainly don't want to add wrinkles >where we could get out of synch between the data dictionary, schema >and models on the basis of my own speculation. > >Cheers, >Rex >-- >Rex Brooks >President, CEO >Starbourne Communications Design >GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison >Berkeley, CA 94702 >Tel: 510-849-2309 > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.3/614 - Release Date: 1/2/2007 >2:58 PM > > > >-- >No virus found in this outgoing message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.3/614 - Release Date: 1/2/2007 >2:58 PM > -- Rex Brooks President, CEO Starbourne Communications Design GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison Berkeley, CA 94702 Tel: 510-849-2309
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]