[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [emergency-msg] Re: Fwd: RE: [emergency] RE: [emergency-msg] RE: EDXL-RM for OASIS review / 60-day public review
Rex, Thanks! I will wait for Mary to answer the question you pose on the Appendix A reference. Thanks too for the posting information. I will include that also. Elysa At 08:47 AM 4/6/2007, Rex Brooks wrote: >Thanks Elysa, > >I have validated all of the schemas (or schemata), individually and >collectively, using XMLSPY. That means I tested all of the >schemas/schemata including the included/imported schemas/schemata >as well as the EDXL Common Reference, Types and individual message >schemas/schemata which use those external schema, such as CIQ and geo-oasis. > >So I am satisfied that our work will stand up to testing. The zipped >group of schemas (schemata) can be found at: >http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/download.php/23014/EDXL-RM-SchemasAndExamplesV1.zip > >There is one thing that concerns me. In the specification Appendix A >it says that "Schemas included in Appendix A are for reference only. >The normative schemas can be found at >http://docs.oasis-open.org/emergency/edxl-rm/v1.0/cd01/schemas/ >However, checking that URL resulted in a "Not Found" screen. I >believe assembling those schemas/schemata at that URL is something >OASIS will do once we finish our submission, but I thought i should >mention it because it would be a bad thing for the public to check >that URL and reach a Not Found message. > >I can post a notice of the EDXL-RM Public Review to the Ontolog >Forum http://ontolog.cim3.net/, which provides at least one >well-regarded publicly-accessible mailing list. > >I have read the correspondence thread below, and I can vouch for >this specification as co-chair of the Emergency management Messages >and Notification Subcommittee. > >Cheers, >Rex > > > >At 4:53 AM -0500 4/6/07, Elysa Jones wrote: >>Good morning Rex! Could you take a look at the correspondence >>below on the RM draft. Mary may be able to announce it today if we >>can get it finished up - and we are ALMOST there. Two things - >>could you as co-chair of the SC that generated the RM provide me a >>comment that the schema is valid. Also, there is a new TC >>requirement to post a notice in a known publicly-accessible mailing >>lists. You may know of such a place but will otherwise ask >>Mary. Thanks, Elysa >> >>>Delivered-To: ejones@warningsystems.com >>>X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1175852546-7c8e00580000-3eiNyE >>>X-Barracuda-URL: http://192.168.128.10:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi >>>X-Barracuda-Connect: ensim3.fuitadnet.com[67.15.28.16] >>>X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1175852546 >>>From: "Lee Tincher" <ltincher@evotecinc.com> >>>To: "'Elysa Jones'" <ejones@warningsystems.com> >>>Cc: "'Tom Wall'" <twall@evotecinc.com> >>>X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: [emergency] RE: [emergency-msg] RE: EDXL-RM >>>for OASIS review / 60-day public review >>>Subject: RE: [emergency] RE: [emergency-msg] RE: EDXL-RM for OASIS >>>review / 60-day public review >>>Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 05:41:51 -0400 >>>X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 >>>thread-index: Acd387iHKHa549RPTrqA4Tnmy8tl0wAO62TQ >>>X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Network Telephone Spam Quarantine at >>>pns.networktel.net >>>X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.88 >>>X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.88 using per-user scores of >>>TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=4.0 tests=FUZZY_CPILL >>>X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.1, rules version 3.1.13392 >>> Rule breakdown below >>> pts rule name description >>> ---- ---------------------- >>> -------------------------------------------------- >>> 0.88 FUZZY_CPILL BODY: Attempt to obfuscate >>> words in spam >>> >>>We referenced docs that existed in the public space already...Tom linked to >>>those. >>> >>>I have validated the reference schema - it is hard without first localizing >>>some of the additional external schemas it uses...but it is correct. I do >>>agree however that it would be better for Rex or Tim to make this statement. >>> >>>I have absolutely no ideas on the mailing list - I'm not sure I really >>>understand the intent... >>> >>>Thanks, >>> >>>Lee >>> >>>'We the unwilling, led by the unknowing have been doing the difficult with >>>little for so long that we are now ready to tackle the impossible with >>>nothing.' -- Local Fire communications reserve volunteer motto >>> >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Elysa Jones [mailto:ejones@warningsystems.com] >>>Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 9:49 PM >>>To: Lee Tincher >>>Subject: Re: [emergency] RE: [emergency-msg] RE: EDXL-RM for OASIS review / >>>60-day public review >>> >>>Hey Lee, Thanks for getting on this. >>> >>>Where exactly are the final files for me to reference in the >>>submission to Mary? I saw the zip attachment to her message but are >>>these in our doc repository? I usually provide her the link on the >>>TC docs for each of the required pieces: .doc, html, pdf, xsd, etc. >>> >>>Can you provide me a statement that the schema is valid? Maybe this >>>should come from Tim or Rex as co-chair of the SC. >>> >>>Also, any ideas of what "publicly-accessible mailing list we can >>>announce this in? This is apparently a new requirement of the >>>process as of March 1, 2007 - sigh >>> >>>Thanks! >>>Elysa >>> >>>At 07:39 PM 4/5/2007, you wrote: >>>>Looks great to me - your ball Elysa... >>>> >>>>Thanks, >>>> >>>>Lee >>>> >>>>'We the unwilling, led by the unknowing have been doing the difficult with >>>>little for so long that we are now ready to tackle the impossible with >>>>nothing.' -- Local Fire communications reserve volunteer motto >>>> >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>From: Mary McRae [mailto:marypmcrae@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Mary McRae >>>>Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 7:44 PM >>>>To: 'Timothy Grapes'; 'Lee Tincher'; 'Elysa Jones' >>>>Cc: emergency@lists.oasis-open.org >>>>Subject: RE: [emergency-msg] RE: EDXL-RM for OASIS review / 60-day public >>>>review >>>> >>>> >>>>Hi folks, >>>> >>>> Lee, there were still a couple of problems with the files you sent - I >>>>think I wasn't very clear with some of my >>>>instructions, and some of the TC URIs didn't actually point to documents, >>>so >>>>I've gone ahead and fixed everything and >>>>generated new PDF and HTML files. I'm sending them back to you for your >>>okay >>>>- it's always good to have another set of >>>>eyes to review everything to make sure nothing got messed up. If everything >>>>looks good, just have Elysa send me a note >>>>saying we're good to go. There are a couple of other pieces needed just to >>>>tidy up the paperwork: >>>> >>>>- a statement from Elysa certifying that the schemas are valid, and >>>>- any known publicly-accessible mailing lists that I should include on the >>>>review notification (this is a new >>>>requirement in the TC Process as of 1 March) >>>> >>>>I'd love to get this announced tomorrow if you folks can find the time to >>>>check it over. >>>> >>>>Thanks, >>>> >>>>Mary > > >-- >Rex Brooks >President, CEO >Starbourne Communications Design >GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison >Berkeley, CA 94702 >Tel: 510-849-2309 >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]