[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [emergency-msg] Re: Fwd: RE: [emergency] RE: [emergency-msg] RE: EDXL-RM for OASIS review / 60-day public review
Yes, I will be posting the schemata at that location before the announcement goes out. Robin gets very upset if I upload documents with broken links! > -----Original Message----- > From: Elysa Jones [mailto:ejones@warningsystems.com] > Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 12:42 PM > To: Rex Brooks; Rex Brooks > Cc: emergency@lists.oasis-open.org; > emergency-msg@lists.oasis-open.org; mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [emergency-msg] Re: Fwd: RE: [emergency] RE: > [emergency-msg] RE: EDXL-RM for OASIS review / 60-day public review > > Rex, Thanks! I will wait for Mary to answer the question > you pose on the Appendix A reference. Thanks too for the > posting information. I will include that also. Elysa > > At 08:47 AM 4/6/2007, Rex Brooks wrote: > >Thanks Elysa, > > > >I have validated all of the schemas (or schemata), individually and > >collectively, using XMLSPY. That means I tested all of the > >schemas/schemata including the included/imported > schemas/schemata as > >well as the EDXL Common Reference, Types and individual message > >schemas/schemata which use those external schema, such as > CIQ and geo-oasis. > > > >So I am satisfied that our work will stand up to testing. The zipped > >group of schemas (schemata) can be found at: > >http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/downlo > ad.php/230 > >14/EDXL-RM-SchemasAndExamplesV1.zip > > > >There is one thing that concerns me. In the specification > Appendix A it > >says that "Schemas included in Appendix A are for reference only. > >The normative schemas can be found at > >http://docs.oasis-open.org/emergency/edxl-rm/v1.0/cd01/schemas/ > >However, checking that URL resulted in a "Not Found" screen. > I believe > >assembling those schemas/schemata at that URL is something > OASIS will > >do once we finish our submission, but I thought i should mention it > >because it would be a bad thing for the public to check that URL and > >reach a Not Found message. > > > >I can post a notice of the EDXL-RM Public Review to the > Ontolog Forum > >http://ontolog.cim3.net/, which provides at least one well-regarded > >publicly-accessible mailing list. > > > >I have read the correspondence thread below, and I can vouch > for this > >specification as co-chair of the Emergency management Messages and > >Notification Subcommittee. > > > >Cheers, > >Rex > > > > > > > >At 4:53 AM -0500 4/6/07, Elysa Jones wrote: > >>Good morning Rex! Could you take a look at the > correspondence below > >>on the RM draft. Mary may be able to announce it today if > we can get > >>it finished up - and we are ALMOST there. Two things - > could you as > >>co-chair of the SC that generated the RM provide me a > comment that the > >>schema is valid. Also, there is a new TC requirement to > post a notice > >>in a known publicly-accessible mailing lists. You may know > of such a > >>place but will otherwise ask Mary. Thanks, Elysa > >> > >>>Delivered-To: ejones@warningsystems.com > >>>X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1175852546-7c8e00580000-3eiNyE > >>>X-Barracuda-URL: http://192.168.128.10:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi > >>>X-Barracuda-Connect: ensim3.fuitadnet.com[67.15.28.16] > >>>X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1175852546 > >>>From: "Lee Tincher" <ltincher@evotecinc.com> > >>>To: "'Elysa Jones'" <ejones@warningsystems.com> > >>>Cc: "'Tom Wall'" <twall@evotecinc.com> > >>>X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: [emergency] RE: [emergency-msg] RE: > EDXL-RM for > >>>OASIS review / 60-day public review > >>>Subject: RE: [emergency] RE: [emergency-msg] RE: EDXL-RM for OASIS > >>>review / 60-day public review > >>>Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 05:41:51 -0400 > >>>X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 > >>>thread-index: Acd387iHKHa549RPTrqA4Tnmy8tl0wAO62TQ > >>>X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Network Telephone Spam Quarantine at > >>>pns.networktel.net > >>>X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.88 > >>>X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.88 using per-user scores of > >>>TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=4.0 > >>>tests=FUZZY_CPILL > >>>X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.1, rules version 3.1.13392 > >>> Rule breakdown below > >>> pts rule name description > >>> ---- ---------------------- > >>> -------------------------------------------------- > >>> 0.88 FUZZY_CPILL BODY: Attempt to obfuscate > >>> words in spam > >>> > >>>We referenced docs that existed in the public space already...Tom > >>>linked to those. > >>> > >>>I have validated the reference schema - it is hard without first > >>>localizing some of the additional external schemas it > uses...but it > >>>is correct. I do agree however that it would be better > for Rex or Tim to make this statement. > >>> > >>>I have absolutely no ideas on the mailing list - I'm not sure I > >>>really understand the intent... > >>> > >>>Thanks, > >>> > >>>Lee > >>> > >>>'We the unwilling, led by the unknowing have been doing > the difficult > >>>with little for so long that we are now ready to tackle the > >>>impossible with nothing.' -- Local Fire communications reserve > >>>volunteer motto > >>> > >>> > >>>-----Original Message----- > >>>From: Elysa Jones [mailto:ejones@warningsystems.com] > >>>Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 9:49 PM > >>>To: Lee Tincher > >>>Subject: Re: [emergency] RE: [emergency-msg] RE: EDXL-RM for OASIS > >>>review / 60-day public review > >>> > >>>Hey Lee, Thanks for getting on this. > >>> > >>>Where exactly are the final files for me to reference in the > >>>submission to Mary? I saw the zip attachment to her > message but are > >>>these in our doc repository? I usually provide her the > link on the > >>>TC docs for each of the required pieces: .doc, html, pdf, > xsd, etc. > >>> > >>>Can you provide me a statement that the schema is valid? > Maybe this > >>>should come from Tim or Rex as co-chair of the SC. > >>> > >>>Also, any ideas of what "publicly-accessible mailing list we can > >>>announce this in? This is apparently a new requirement of the > >>>process as of March 1, 2007 - sigh > >>> > >>>Thanks! > >>>Elysa > >>> > >>>At 07:39 PM 4/5/2007, you wrote: > >>>>Looks great to me - your ball Elysa... > >>>> > >>>>Thanks, > >>>> > >>>>Lee > >>>> > >>>>'We the unwilling, led by the unknowing have been doing the > >>>>difficult with little for so long that we are now ready to tackle > >>>>the impossible with nothing.' -- Local Fire > communications reserve > >>>>volunteer motto > >>>> > >>>>-----Original Message----- > >>>>From: Mary McRae [mailto:marypmcrae@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Mary > >>>>McRae > >>>>Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 7:44 PM > >>>>To: 'Timothy Grapes'; 'Lee Tincher'; 'Elysa Jones' > >>>>Cc: emergency@lists.oasis-open.org > >>>>Subject: RE: [emergency-msg] RE: EDXL-RM for OASIS review > / 60-day > >>>>public review > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>Hi folks, > >>>> > >>>> Lee, there were still a couple of problems with the files you > >>>>sent - I think I wasn't very clear with some of my > instructions, and > >>>>some of the TC URIs didn't actually point to documents, > >>>so > >>>>I've gone ahead and fixed everything and generated new > PDF and HTML > >>>>files. I'm sending them back to you for your > >>>okay > >>>>- it's always good to have another set of eyes to review > everything > >>>>to make sure nothing got messed up. If everything looks > good, just > >>>>have Elysa send me a note saying we're good to go. There are a > >>>>couple of other pieces needed just to tidy up the paperwork: > >>>> > >>>>- a statement from Elysa certifying that the schemas are > valid, and > >>>>- any known publicly-accessible mailing lists that I > should include > >>>>on the review notification (this is a new requirement in the TC > >>>>Process as of 1 March) > >>>> > >>>>I'd love to get this announced tomorrow if you folks can find the > >>>>time to check it over. > >>>> > >>>>Thanks, > >>>> > >>>>Mary > > > > > >-- > >Rex Brooks > >President, CEO > >Starbourne Communications Design > >GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison > >Berkeley, CA 94702 > >Tel: 510-849-2309 > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]